Biden and Dems are still Hiding their Supreme Court Picks Why?

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T12:28:55.165Z

Guvnah:

Jezcoe:

He is on the hook… personally guaranteed… for over $400 million dollars.

How does a copy of a man’s tax return tell anyone about what loans are coming due?

Because one can see when the when the loan was taken… for how much… how much interest has been paid and when that loan is due.

So with one loan, he took is out in 2012 for $100 million has paid only interest… nothing on the principle and it comes due in 2 years.

This would be in the middle of a potential second term.

He doesn’t have near $100 million cash on hand.

So… what happens?

gooddad409 · 2020-10-05T12:29:19.596Z

DougBH:

That’s it. If they give their list they either alienate the far leftists who’s vote they want or give up any pretense at being middle of the road and alienating the independents.

Yep they would lose either part of their radical base or part of the independents so in a most cowardly fashion they refuse to answer.

Refuse to reveal picks or whether they will pack the court. Saw a poll on that saying 70 percent of voters oppose packing the court.

SottoVoce · 2020-10-05T12:32:08.873Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

SottoVoce:

Hawk92:

For the same liberals who are claiming that they love the constitution they dont seem to be acting upon it. By trying to hide their choices for the Courts. Is it problary they know because their choices would be problary to socialist on the issues?

I must have missed the part where the Constitution says the minority (or controlling) party must list its potential Supreme Court justices in advance. How many must they list to avoid “hiding” their choices from “the Courts?” Where can I find the list for the Republican party? I think it’s “problary” not there.

Please link to the post where someone said it was part of the constitution. I must have missed that post.

Sure. Was in the OP. Second paragraph.

Hawk92:

For the same liberals who are claiming that they love the constitution they dont seem to be acting upon it. By trying to hide their choices for the Courts. Is it problary they know because their choices would be problary to socialist on the issues?

WuWei · 2020-10-05T12:33:03.977Z

WuWei:

Jezcoe:

I know that they won’t be someone from the Federalist society pipeline and that is good enough for me

What pipeline do the dems use?

Maybe @Safiel knows

WuWei · 2020-10-05T12:34:58.813Z

Or even suggest it was an option?

WuWei · 2020-10-05T12:35:37.424Z

SottoVoce:

The attempt at tu quoque is laughable.

Yet true.

WuWei · 2020-10-05T12:39:06.033Z

Like China? Remember when libs said he owed China millions, then it turned out he had already paid it off?

Good times.

Guvnah · 2020-10-05T12:41:39.895Z

Jezcoe:

Guvnah:

How does a copy of a man’s tax return tell anyone about what loans are coming due?

Because one can see when the when the loan was taken… for how much…

Not from any tax return I have ever filled out.

Call_me_Ishmael · 2020-10-05T12:45:12.053Z

Point noted. My mistake.

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T12:46:03.310Z

Guvnah:

Jezcoe:

Guvnah:

How does a copy of a man’s tax return tell anyone about what loans are coming due?

Because one can see when the when the loan was taken… for how much…

Not from any tax return I have ever filled out.

So… this is all fake.

cool.

Guvnah · 2020-10-05T12:49:47.907Z

Jezcoe:

So… this is all fake.

Strawman, for sure.

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T12:50:51.131Z

Guvnah:

Jezcoe:

So… this is all fake.

Strawman, for sure.

So is the news of huge loans true or not?

Guvnah · 2020-10-05T12:57:15.058Z

Jezcoe:

So is the news of huge loans true or not?

I have no idea. If it’s coming from the kool-aid fountain (the MSM), I don’t accept its veracity.

You NEED it to be true, so for you it is.

I will say this: I truly doubt Trump has such a personal loan. If anything, it’s a loan to one of the corporations he owns. Thus his personal income is immaterial to the disposition of such a loan.

Usually loans like that get paid off with another loan. At a minimum the particular corporation can sell off whatever assets are needed to pay the loan (if refinancing it is not an option.) And the last resort is for the corporation to bankrupt against it.

But TDS dictates that this represents some nefarious situation somehow. I don’t know how you libs have any hair left.

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T13:08:40.230Z

Guvnah:

Usually loans like that get paid off with another loan.

Okay… let us go with this.

If he does have such a loan ( I mean he does but let us go with probably) and is personally on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars coming due while he is serving as President… what happens?

Does he ignore the business of running the country while working to secure a loan? What if he can’t secure such loan?

Call_me_Ishmael · 2020-10-05T13:22:57.677Z

What if progs’ favorite leader can’t get laid. Will they take time out from governing to find a willing partner? Will they use their power to persuade someone to become their partner.

Why are you interested in Trump’s personal life?

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T13:25:44.896Z

Well that took a strange turn.

PurpnGold · 2020-10-05T13:28:56.597Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

What if progs’ favorite leader can’t get laid. Will they take time out from governing to find a willing partner? Will they use their power to persuade someone to become their partner.

Why are you interested in Trump’s personal life?

Uhhhh what?

Call_me_Ishmael · 2020-10-05T14:20:09.543Z

Exactly…

Why is trump’s personal finances of interest? Because it could lead to a conflict of interest? Sex has been shown to be as much a driver of behavior as money is. For those who hold government responsibility, the legitimacy of ones sexual activity is a reportable topic. SO Why arn’t you folks wondering if Nadler isn’t abusing his power to abuse one of his boy interns?

Why are you only interested in Trump’s potential for conflicts of interest? Is money the more important issue? Then why would you ever vote for Biden with his family’s financial benefits from foreign countries?

Something is amiss in your obsession with Trump’s finances. I detect an absence of integrity in the left’s concern about conflicts of interest, especially financial conflicts of interests.

Paul_Thomson · 2020-10-05T14:21:32.974Z

Ben_Natuf:

bankruptcies are public records, have fun. otherwise, who cares about negotiating for a loan? you don’t get to go fishing just because you think there maybe, possibly, might be a fish.

People who have never succeeded in honest business have lots of theories about how business should work and are always ready to find fault with business people who don’t subscribe to their academic but unworkable theories.

PurpnGold · 2020-10-05T14:35:18.277Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

Exactly…

Why is trump’s personal finances of interest? Because it could lead to a conflict of interest? Sex has been shown to be as much a driver of behavior as money is. For those who hold government responsibility, the legitimacy of ones sexual activity is a reportable topic. SO Why arn’t you folks wondering if Nadler isn’t abusing his power to abuse one of his boy interns?

Why are you only interested in Trump’s potential for conflicts of interest? Is money the more important issue? Then why would you ever vote for Biden with his family’s financial benefits from foreign countries?

Something is amiss in your obsession with Trump’s finances. I detect an absence of integrity in the left’s concern about conflicts of interest, especially financial conflicts of interests.

Something is weirdly missing from your unfounded rant.

Not only is Trump being broke with loans he can’t pay… an issue… but he is also a serial adulterer (he paid a stripper 130k to hush). So the tone deaf assessment you made above also applies to Trump.