Biden and Dems are still Hiding their Supreme Court Picks Why?

Guvnah · 2020-10-05T12:15:38.694Z

Jezcoe:

It is not “derangement” to say …

Part of TDS is a pathological inability to recognize it in oneself.

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T12:16:54.818Z

Guvnah:

Jezcoe:

It is not “derangement” to say …

Part of TDS is a pathological inability to recognize it in oneself.

Would the President owing hundreds of millions of dollars that he has no way of paying back and having those loans come due during a second term be cool for any President… or just his one?

Guvnah · 2020-10-05T12:17:42.956Z

Jezcoe:

… he has no way of paying back …

Link?

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T12:18:16.771Z

Guvnah:

Jezcoe:

… he has no way of paying back …

Link?

nytimes.com – 27 Sep 20

Trump’s Taxes Show Chronic Losses and Years of Income Tax Avoidance...

The Times obtained Donald Trump’s tax information extending over more than two decades, revealing struggling properties, vast write-offs, an audit battle and hundreds of millions in debt coming due.

Guvnah · 2020-10-05T12:24:12.318Z

Jezcoe:

The Times obtained Donald Trump’s tax information extending over more than two decades, revealing struggling properties, vast write-offs, an audit battle and hundreds of millions in debt coming due.

That doesn’t show he won’t be able to pay.

Besides, you’re linking the NYT’s “report”. Dude, they’re not just kool-aid drinkers. They’re the kool-aid bar! They hate Trump, and feed you the spin you need to service your TDS.

And how does a copy of a man’s tax return tell anyone about what loans are coming due?

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T12:25:00.294Z

Guvnah:

Jezcoe:

The Times obtained Donald Trump’s tax information extending over more than two decades, revealing struggling properties, vast write-offs, an audit battle and hundreds of millions in debt coming due.

That doesn’t show he won’t be able to pay.

Besides, you’re linking the NYT’s “report”. Dude, they’re not just kool-aid drinkers. They’re the kool-aid bar! They hate Trump, and feed you the spin you need to service your TDS.

He is on the hook… personally guaranteed… for over $400 million dollars.

He doesn’t make a profit. He hasn’t in years.

So… where is he going to get the money?

Guvnah · 2020-10-05T12:25:47.724Z

Jezcoe:

He is on the hook… personally guaranteed… for over $400 million dollars.

How does a copy of a man’s tax return tell anyone about what loans are coming due?

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T12:28:55.165Z

Guvnah:

Jezcoe:

He is on the hook… personally guaranteed… for over $400 million dollars.

How does a copy of a man’s tax return tell anyone about what loans are coming due?

Because one can see when the when the loan was taken… for how much… how much interest has been paid and when that loan is due.

So with one loan, he took is out in 2012 for $100 million has paid only interest… nothing on the principle and it comes due in 2 years.

This would be in the middle of a potential second term.

He doesn’t have near $100 million cash on hand.

So… what happens?

gooddad409 · 2020-10-05T12:29:19.596Z

DougBH:

That’s it. If they give their list they either alienate the far leftists who’s vote they want or give up any pretense at being middle of the road and alienating the independents.

Yep they would lose either part of their radical base or part of the independents so in a most cowardly fashion they refuse to answer.

Refuse to reveal picks or whether they will pack the court. Saw a poll on that saying 70 percent of voters oppose packing the court.

SottoVoce · 2020-10-05T12:32:08.873Z

Call_me_Ishmael:

SottoVoce:

Hawk92:

For the same liberals who are claiming that they love the constitution they dont seem to be acting upon it. By trying to hide their choices for the Courts. Is it problary they know because their choices would be problary to socialist on the issues?

I must have missed the part where the Constitution says the minority (or controlling) party must list its potential Supreme Court justices in advance. How many must they list to avoid “hiding” their choices from “the Courts?” Where can I find the list for the Republican party? I think it’s “problary” not there.

Please link to the post where someone said it was part of the constitution. I must have missed that post.

Sure. Was in the OP. Second paragraph.

Hawk92:

For the same liberals who are claiming that they love the constitution they dont seem to be acting upon it. By trying to hide their choices for the Courts. Is it problary they know because their choices would be problary to socialist on the issues?

WuWei · 2020-10-05T12:33:03.977Z

WuWei:

Jezcoe:

I know that they won’t be someone from the Federalist society pipeline and that is good enough for me

What pipeline do the dems use?

Maybe @Safiel knows

WuWei · 2020-10-05T12:34:58.813Z

Or even suggest it was an option?

WuWei · 2020-10-05T12:35:37.424Z

SottoVoce:

The attempt at tu quoque is laughable.

Yet true.

WuWei · 2020-10-05T12:39:06.033Z

Like China? Remember when libs said he owed China millions, then it turned out he had already paid it off?

Good times.

Guvnah · 2020-10-05T12:41:39.895Z

Jezcoe:

Guvnah:

How does a copy of a man’s tax return tell anyone about what loans are coming due?

Because one can see when the when the loan was taken… for how much…

Not from any tax return I have ever filled out.

Call_me_Ishmael · 2020-10-05T12:45:12.053Z

Point noted. My mistake.

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T12:46:03.310Z

Guvnah:

Jezcoe:

Guvnah:

How does a copy of a man’s tax return tell anyone about what loans are coming due?

Because one can see when the when the loan was taken… for how much…

Not from any tax return I have ever filled out.

So… this is all fake.

cool.

Guvnah · 2020-10-05T12:49:47.907Z

Jezcoe:

So… this is all fake.

Strawman, for sure.

Jezcoe · 2020-10-05T12:50:51.131Z

Guvnah:

Jezcoe:

So… this is all fake.

Strawman, for sure.

So is the news of huge loans true or not?

Guvnah · 2020-10-05T12:57:15.058Z

Jezcoe:

So is the news of huge loans true or not?

I have no idea. If it’s coming from the kool-aid fountain (the MSM), I don’t accept its veracity.

You NEED it to be true, so for you it is.

I will say this: I truly doubt Trump has such a personal loan. If anything, it’s a loan to one of the corporations he owns. Thus his personal income is immaterial to the disposition of such a loan.

Usually loans like that get paid off with another loan. At a minimum the particular corporation can sell off whatever assets are needed to pay the loan (if refinancing it is not an option.) And the last resort is for the corporation to bankrupt against it.

But TDS dictates that this represents some nefarious situation somehow. I don’t know how you libs have any hair left.