There are no actual serious questions just huffing and puffing.
Trump could expose the whole lot by simply releasing the Fisa docs, but he wont cause he knows the FBI was right in investigating him just the simple fact that everyone lied is enough.
There are no actual serious questions just huffing and puffing.
Trump could expose the whole lot by simply releasing the Fisa docs, but he wont cause he knows the FBI was right in investigating him just the simple fact that everyone lied is enough.
Thread police? I never knew. Huh.
Perhaps because it didn’t happen?
There are no actual serious questions just huffing and puffing.
Trump could expose the whole lot by simply releasing the Fisa docs, but he wont cause he knows the FBI was right in investigating him just the simple fact that everyone lied is enough.
We’ll see. The investigation is just beginning. Patience.
LOL!!!
Says the Chris Davis of the forum: 0-for-
Thread police? I never knew. Huh.
Not the thread police. Just the thread’s creator. Trying to keep my thread on topic as per forum guidelines. You have no problem with that. Right?
NebraskaFootball:Thread police? I never knew. Huh.
Not the thread police. Just the thread’s creator. Trying to keep my thread on topic as per forum guidelines. You have no problem with that. Right?
Irony is ironical.
He wasn’t placed under surveillance.
There’s the explanation.
I think we need an investigation into Barr’s investigation of the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign. There are serious questions about his handling of the matter. I don’t see why anyone wouldn’t want them answered.
Irony is ironical.
I’ll take that as a yes. You’re ready to get back on topic. Excellent choice!
NebraskaFootball:Irony is ironical.
I’ll take that as a yes. You’re ready to get back on topic. Excellent choice!
I wasn’t the one acting like the thread police trying to derail my own thread with arbitrary, illogical, inaccurate rules.
NebraskaFootball: altair1013: Kuta:Same applies to Trumps tax returns. The returns the congress has a legal right to look at.
Wrong thread.
There is already an open discussion on this topic.Thread police? I never knew. Huh.
He opens the door, then when others rush in and he realizes he got himself in a jam, he decides its this is not the right thread, classic trumplicanista.
Indeed. An identical refrain and a perfect segue correlating the two relatable, pertinent issues. I can see where the discomfort would arise though.
NebraskaFootball:Irony is ironical.
I’ll take that as a yes. You’re ready to get back on topic. Excellent choice!
I smell that vibe again.
I wasn’t the one acting like the thread police trying to derail my own thread with arbitrary, illogical, inaccurate rules.
Do you have any concerns toward the justification of the Trump hoax? Was it all perfectly non political? Or do we need more information?
If the IG finds there was justification, then there’s no hoax.
You mean the review?
Is a review synonymous with investigation?
All investigations are reviews but not all reviews are investigations…
Hillary’s criminal email investigation was a “security review”. I know this because she told us so.
DougBH:Seriously…Barr is head of the DOJ. He isn’t supposed to review how his people did their work?
This isn’t some bogus special counsel set up.There are serious questions regarding the way the FBI handled this. I’m not sure why anyone would not want them answered.
Seriously?
Democrat Politicians Colluded with Russia.
They’re simply projecting things upon Trump.
That’s why Hillary had to hurry up and cover everything up very quickly.
Seriously?
Yes. Seriously. And fortunately the A.G. agrees.