Obliviously its a disgusting crime … But what is it about this case that has so much of Barrs attention?.. Sincere question, do AG’s normally get involved down to this level? I’m kind of thinking maybe he and his boss thought they had a shot at involving Clinton…just a hunch.
Of course it shouldn’t have happened…But do AG’s normally get involved if a witness off’s himself in a cell, or its done to him? Sounds more like a DA’s job or maybe a States AG.
A case that reaches possibly out to foriegn royaty, possibly a past president, many, MANY well connected people dies in custody and you don’t think it’s going to garner the attention of the Attorney General?
“Trump has previously praised Epstein as a “terrific guy” and, according to the filing, Epstein once welcomed Trump aboard his private plane, hosted him in his Palm Beach home and had 14 phone numbers for Trump in a computer directory”
There is nothing either wrong or even unusual about Attorney General Barr’s actions in removing the ACTING Chief of the Bureau of Prisons. There is no currently appointed Chief or Deputy Chief of the BoP. That being the case, it is quite proper for the Attorney General to directly take action.
In this case, the Acting Chief (a career civil servant) has been reassigned to be in charge of the residential halfway house division. Another careerist has been brought in to be Acting Chief.
This is a simple case of trying to manufacture a controversy where none exists.