Post how it goes when you find a High School drop out to do surgery on a member of your family.

No matter how many times you call it an opinion, some opinions are better informed, better thought out and more significant than others.

Vietnam.

It is still an opinion.

The DOJ answers the judge,

“The entire report was then reviewed by career attorneys, including different career attorneys with expertise in FOIA cases — a process in which the attorney general played no role,” Kupec said.

Emphasis mine. Interesting response.

If the judge is right and the redactions were made in a biased fashion just to help Trump, the judge will be releasing tons of statements under the FOIA and you will be hearing all about it on CNN and reading it in NYTs. If the judge is full of it he will not find much if anything that was redacted for political reasons, will have nothing to release, and you will never hear a word about it on CNN or read about it in the NYTs.

Well, as I said, many a Supreme Court ruling by the cream of the legal minds in the country comes in at 5-4 or 4-5. Your man’s opinion is just one of many well being informed opinions and I am sure if you ask the opinion of his peers, they will vary just like those of the regal nine.

What? No. That is not remotely close to what I’m saying.

It should be what you are saying. This is a FOIA case. The only reason for the judge to go into his political diatribe about Barr was because he decided Barr was biased and therefore the judge said he was suspicious that the DOJ redactions in the report might be for political reasons to protect Trump and not for legitimate reasons.
If the judge reviews the redactions and finds that they were made for political reasons, he will “unredact them” under the FOIA and we will indeed see them.
If we see no redactions, then the judge did not find any redactions that were made solely for political purposes, and his whole theory was just garbage.

1 Like

a process in which the attorney general played no role,” Kupec said.