How the hell this arrived at the blaze office? 
Ah, an epistemological argument, excellent! Very CRT!
First we need to separate knowledge and understanding, do we not?
Then there is the whole a priori and a posteriori thing.
And the discussion of what racism actually is.
I wasnât inferring anything about critical race theory, but Iâll agree with the rest.
It takes an understanding of being able to referenceâŚwhat your âhearingâ from sources with an agenda and what youâre observingâŚwith the intent of seeing, what it is thatâs being stated. As I pointed out, having a reference point of the times when Martin Luther King Jr. walked among us, what was going on at the time vs whatâs happening todayâŚhelps a lot in this endeavor.
CRT relies on epistemology to survive. And the topic is racism.
Is Joe Biden racist? Why or why not?
Is Donald Trump racist? Why or why not?
Why? Iâve never been a victim of racism. Iâve never been raped or murdered. That doesnât mean I canât know all those things exist and they are bad. The argument that âthings were worseâ is a non sequitur. I care about current events. That is the reference point; right now. Things being âless racistâ has no impact on the current desire for no racism or even less racism. Itâs like saying women were treated poorly in the past, things have improved, so no need to continue to make sure they are treated equally.
Itâs fine some people are satisfied with ânot as bad as it was.â I prefer continued improvement despite past gains. To me, ânot as racist, so people should stop complainingâ is not OK.
1 Like
Great. CRT is a specific theory of racism. A theory I do not know enough about to comment on. You can talk about racism and epistemology without specifically discussing CRT.
Thatâs normal in China as it is in Japan India, all of Asia, South America, Eastern Europe all of Asia pretty much every bit of the world except for the United States Australia and Western Europe, some donât realize that once you leave this country unless your in a western country no one shares your views on race and multiculturalism.
They see Barbie here having to be guilty and think âhell no we donât want those problems hereâ.
Why do imaginary doll conversations belong in Politics?
Reading about leftist, politicized Barbies, and seeing the trolling, is the best case yet for a collective drug addiction. Adrenochrome, is becoming a more believable addiction. Or maybe just wholesale opiates or microdosing of designer psychoactives, in the phenylalamine family.
The most predominant feature is lying, no-conscience, wholesale, lying. delusion.
These are China bots
Yeah you never see majority ethnic groups oppressed by minority ethnic groups in any of those countries.
Seems deliciously apropos to me.
But then I love a good chuckle from time to time.
Figured this must be more Q nonsense.
You know you can actually buy adrenochrome legally from Europe and it does nothing except give you a very brief pot-like high.
It produces brain changes and is addictive
Can you name another âtheory of racismâ?
Can I? I donât think so.
You need a specific âtheory of racismâ to discuss racism? How did people discuss racism before CRT? Or did racism not exist before CRT?
I donât know, what are we going to use? With criticism?
Arguing with bots is a ridiculous waste of time
