We haven’t even begun the argument. Surrender? 
NEVER!
Make your argument.
My argument is that when you accept liberal interpretations of the 2A
I’ll accept more liberal interpretations of the 3A. Even though there’s no mention of militarization of the police in the 3A.
Ah, ok. You don’t have to accept it. They don’t care.
It’s Balko’s theory, I just happen to agree with it.
I have no issue with not selling military hardware to local police, but to create some fantasy that their are only doing it to take away your guns is stupid.
Why are they doing it?
mostly because its cheap as hell Pentagon has so much overstock they sell it for pennies.
What happened to literal reading of the constitution?
Uh no. They don’t just get it from Centgov. They also buy it.
They don’t buy it at market value, its solid for pennies meaning they can get military hardware cheaper then normal police equipment.
No, they buy it on the market too. They get a discount on just about everything even on the market.
It’s still here. You can have the point.
What’s the difference in the two pictures?
The DOD sell it for pennies or sometimes just gives it away for free.
You’re not listening. They don’t get it all from DOD.
I have to go to bed in a minute.
One are the police, one are the military. And there is a big difference. If you guys hadn’t insisted on flooding the country with military type weapons we wouldn’t need police that looked like the military.
The OP is talking about program 1033 and Trump move to remove Obama era regulation placed on it to lower the amount of military hardware sold.
How do you know one is military?
I know that. Damn.
What military?
