A whole lot of tap dancing going on today.

IMG_0672

1 Like

Bathing suits.

again, these are safe assumptions. or at least natural to make.

theres less reason to assume otherwise

In her assumed private diary. Let’s not forget that she wrote those entries never thinking they would be leaked .

would that be “traumatizing?”

you are trying to justify this weirdness

She is after all the one most guilty of elder abuse.

doesnt change my post. she sees it. got to rate high on cringe factor

Do you know what she means by that?

There is a huge gulf between “probably inappropriate” and sexual molestation.

1 Like

The only ones who are doing a performance are the ones that are adding to what was written.

Especially since it had been publicly said by the very person who wrote it that it is being misinterpreted.

yes. that whatever it was, it was prob inappro.

:man_shrugging:.

words have meaning

Or gross misinterpretation and false accusations like Ashley is saying.

You all are doing the thing that she is talking about.

How is the assumption of sexual molestation a safe assumption to make?

gotta love the “just because she says showers doesnt mean they were naked” defense

2 Likes

i did not make that assumption.

what she wrote is ghastly enough

Did she say that that was traumatizing?

It is a sentence fragment in a stream of consciousness diary entry.

yes in her testimony

It could mean they were naked. It could also mean she was naked but he wasn’t. It could also mean that neither of them were naked.

“Young age” could mean 4,5,6,7,8…. It could also mean 11,12,13.

Maybe she was old enough to remember the shower… or maybe she was told about it from another family member or Joe himself. Only she knows.

It’s all wild speculation from conservatives that Ashley specifically calls out as “gross misinterpretation and false accusations.”

either way it is “prob inappropriate”

her words. it raises big questions.

That the diary was stolen and leaked… that was traumatizing.

because of the contents which she does not refute