have you seen anywhere that i prejudged the company contracted to run the program to put illegals in hotels even though they had no experience with either hotels or illegals?
no you have not.
do i think they should have been hired? no
did it effect their work? not that iāve seen so far
This company, the clown-named CyberNinjas, failed to mark the ballots properly, broke chain of custody, violated procedures for the handling of ballots.
Judge that.
of course i did. now go find anything anywhere where i said their report was garbage before it was published.
i acknowledge the company has displayed bias. did you acknowledge that with mueller?
now, lets wait for the report
Oops. Oddly enough he takes the exact opposite opinion in that instance
Endeavors was experienced at providing housing and supportive servicesā¦theyāve been doing it for homeless people for years.
What major differences do you believe there is in securing housing for homeless people and securing housing for migrants that could have caused a fatal flaw in the āfinished productā?
and i expect all of that to be apparent in the report. so whats the problem? what is it with you gus that you insist everyone must denounce a report that does not as yet exist? why is it a problem for you that i will withhold final judgement until i actually see the report? they have issues, and that will be a part of whats looked at when judging the final product,
You expect a companyās management to police itself and report its errors when it has a vested reputational and financial interesting in obfuscating its errors?
and where in that did i say the report was trash befor it was published?
we shall see. what i expect is fairly irrelevant since the product isnāt here yet
This is like digging a sapperās tunnel beneath the entire run of your argument.
We arenāt denouncing the report.
We are stating facts.
*The āauditā is partisan in nature and funded by partisans- exactly the opposite of how a forensic audit should go
*The āauditā is being performed by highly unqualified individuals who have never worked a major forensic audit before
*These unqualified individuals have broken every rule of forensic auditing, have not been transparent, and have made a series of grade school errors that has completely tainted the evidenceā¦so much so even the Republicans who backed their hiring are now complaining
And you continue to deflect away from this by saying āWell I have to wait and see how the finished product turns out until I can judgeā.
Thatās how we know you arenāt being objective. You would absolutely judge a service provider if they were providing you a service this badly. You would absolutely not āwait for the finished productā before making such a judgement.
And you know it.
Isnāt that kind of implied? You didnāt say ānow letās wait for the reportā because you didnāt think the report would prove anything because ofā¦ bias
I acknowledge that Mueller had Democrats on his team.
I know you eat the food even after you witness the cook scratching his nethers and failing to wash his hands, right?
did you find anywhere in there where i said even two words disparaging the mueller report before it was published?
no.
you have a strawman, and it lacks straw
did you acknowledge their bias?
Comey and Mueller?
Sure. Republican institutionalists.
Donāt judge until you see the final product. It could be a delicious taint burger for all you know.
Wheeenn
Theeeeeee
Hand hits the crotch, it takes your food up a notch, thatās umami
When your chicken and your swine, have a little extra brine, thatās umami
Would you support hiring vocal BLM supporters to control your local police force? We canāt judge how theyād do until we see for ourselves right?
