This isn’t a new issue its been happening for like 100 years.
And cut Puerto Rico loose.
No! MINE!
1 Like
Eeeewwww!
2 Likes
Then they went home tothier fossil fuel heated homes by fossil fuel burning cars. How do people get so out of touch?
2 Likes
Here is the relevent text with the exemption:
. . .
Why are registered Indians exempt?
The First Nations protests have resulted violence against pipeline construction sites, disruptions in rail and port transportation, and arson attacks against churches. In contrast the trucker protests have been non-violent.
You seem to have edited the image to give a fake narrative, why did you remove section 3 from your image?
3 (1) A foreign national must not enter Canada with the intent to participate in or facilitate an assembly referred to in subsection 2(1).
Exemption
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to
(a) a person registered as an Indian under the Indian Act; (b) a person who has been recognized as a Convention refugee or a person in similar circumstances to those of a Convention refugee within the meaning of subsection 146(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations who is issued a permanent resident visa under subsection 139(1) of those regulations; (c) a person who has been issued a temporary resident permit within the meaning of subsection 24(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and who seeks to enter Canada as a protected temporary resident under subsection 151.1(2) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations; (d) a person who seeks to enter Canada for the purpose of making a claim for refugee protection; (e) a protected person; (f) a person or any person in a class of persons whose presence in Canada, as determined by the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration or the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, is in the national interest.
No, the exemption is referring to section 2(1) not 3(1). Look at the full text again.
Maxime Bernier’s reading is correct. It is as if he is a lawyer in addition to being a party leader.
Maxime is a loon.
Hahaha 
1 Like
No, the exception is referring to section 2(1), even though it comes after section 3(1).
The layout of the document is confusing, but the text is clear:
Bernier is right.
1 Like
do they even teach civics anymore.
Nor reading.
(2) applies to section (1) of Section 3.
if it applied to section 2 (1) it would be in Section 2.
this isn’t rocket science.
Okay, the reading depends on the details of how Canadian legal documents are structured.
Assuming that Indians are not exempt, will Trudeau enforce the emergency order against people who are actually committing acts of “violence against person or property” at the British Columbia pipeline project?
Or will he continue to target peaceful protestors?
Has BC requested the emergencies act, like Ontario did.
Does it matter?
Would all the actions stop in Ontario if the premier said no?
Federal government need request of assistance to use the emergencies act.
Indication
(3) The Governor in Council may not issue a declaration of a public order emergency where the effects of the emergency are confined to one province, unless the lieutenant governor in council of the province has indicated to the Governor in Council that the emergency exceeds the capacity or authority of the province to deal with it.
The cause is only active when the effects are confined to only one province:
(3) The Governor in Council may not issue a declaration of a public order emergency where the effects of the emergency are confined to one province, unless the lieutenant governor in council of the province has indicated to the Governor in Council that the emergency exceeds the capacity or authority of the province to deal with it.
The effects of the trucker protest extend to multiple provinces. Likewise the effects of First Nations protests extend to multiple provinces.
Will the federal government send in police armed with assault rifles to address the pipeline attacks?
1 Like
