It is separate. They are two separate documents. We are debating reality again.
Cynic
104
Then be mad at the CEC who made this your talking point.
separate docs. yes. separate points? no
here’s some reality. a summary summarizes what’s in something
in other words, you fail to see the humor
lol
it all appeared right in the summary.
the “cec” has nothing to do with it
Cynic
109
There is plenty to laugh at, just not this article.
not much besides all of your angry replies
made my day
Cynic
111
Not understanding what the statement means is certainly your and the CECs problem.
verbatim. in the summary
they linked cow “farting” and airplane emissions as something to get rid of.
nothing to do with insults to anyone, or the cec
Cynic
113
No, the statement is specifically stating that they can NOT get rid of them, and therefore zero emissions is not feasible, only net.
not “fully” get rid of them “that fast”
sounds like theyre on a mission to get rid of them eventually, somehow
but then i’m a just mere thinking man, reading actual words
I love the “united spot” vidoes on youtube… There’s a couple of cuss words but it’s pretty funny.
Amazing how much funnier youtube is than the “professionals” on broadcast YV…lol!
Cynic
116
So as a self proclaimed connoisseur of satire, this overt example managed to escape you?
hang on i’m recalibrating to your new narrative…
ok so now that summary was just an attemp at comedy?
looks to be unavail. another source? looked funny
Cynic
119
Yes, it was a sarcastic FAQ response acknowledging that the elimination of all absolute emissions is not feasible; picking something that will never be eliminated is the point.
ok recalibrating again…
now it’s sarcasm not satire?
what will it be next?
Cynic
121
They are not mutually exclusive; you seem to need lots of time to “recalibrate”, maybe get some rest? It’s really not that complicated.