Leftist judges with a political agenda may agree but that doesn’t make it true.
Every parent who has ever been arrested and/or incarcerated has been separated from their kids and this administration has been completely within the law with their policies. Laws and court rulings which were all passed/made during prior administrations.
Washington, Jefferson and most of the early presidents continued to make money directly from their businesses during their terms in office. Carter continued to make money directly from his farming and processing operations throughout his presidency. The Kennedys, including JFK made money directly from their family enterprises throughout their terms in office.
Pelosi and Reid each made tens of millions from their family enterprises throughout their terms in congress and Pelosi continues to.
Judges have ruled the families are to be reunited, so that point is wrong.
Please give very specific and detailed proof that Washington, Jefferson and early presidents owned huge hotels all over the country and made the vast amount of money that Trump is.
Provide detailed proof about your accusations of Pelosi. Reid is no longer in Congress, so he’s not in question.
IT’s completely related since it is absolutely true. The only judges making such rulings are those that are leftwing political activists and have been throughout their careers.
Same for your number two.
Three, asking me to support something else I never said. True to form for you.
Reid is completely relevant since we’re discussing history.
Pelosi benefits directly from the legislation she endorses and gets passed.
To be fair, the same is true with Clinton also. Reality is most Americans simply don’t closely follow politics like we all do. They have at best a cursory understanding of big, broad strokes. Some not even that. Not detailed specifics covering the whole array of topics a given candidate may be running on.
Surely you’re not disputing that are you? Trying to claim that the majority of Americans are dialed in to all aspects of politicking? Because that would just be bonkers my friend.
I’m ignoring “Newsmax” and WFB as sources since they’re not real journalism sites.
As for the CBS News link, did you miss the words “could have been seen as a conflict of interest.” No charges there, only a question. The same sort of questions about Trump (with even more evidence) you routinely dismiss.
Madasheck to start. He’s constantly saying how much he loves her, how awesome she is because she upsets cons, has a picture of her as his avatar… and that took 10 seconds.
Cons aren’t scared of AOC particularly. They are scared as hell of what she represents, her ideas and the fact that those ideas are becoming more mainstream every day.