Samm
1109

Isn’t that what “now the majority” means?
Samm
1110
Or that European tokens are cheaper to hire. 
Samm
1112
That’s racist. Those attributes are genetic.
2 Likes
Samm
1113
Uses, not needs. When I was a kid, we played a lot of football with just a ball. I expect kids still do today.
I agree, but for some reason, MLB tries to artificially boost the number of American Black players when it’s obvious they don’t really care about baseball. It’s too “boring”. There are plenty of Blacks from Latin American countries to make up for it.
1 Like
Football equipment is crazy expensive!
You’re right on the money about what sports garner the most interest with the different groups. I think the European White NBA players are comparable to the Latino Black players in MLB.
Especially if it is unusually large. The last helmet I had was big enough (size 8.25 hat at the time) that one of my fellow linemen could put it on while wearing his glasses and spin it around, not messing up the glasses.
There is a chance they got to use it again before the helmet itself became too old, but who knows.
1 Like
Damn, you must have a 190 IQ 
playing and competitive minor sport are not the same.
competitive minor sport be it basketball, baseball, hockey, gymnastic, etc is very expensive.
a lot of people can’t simply afford to send their kid to play some sport on a competitive level its not cheap unless your child is a prodigy.
Baseball/Hockey are both travelling system your driving hours every weekend.
Basketball is becoming more and more expensive with the increase of elite private schools.
Samm
1121
It’s the competition that’s expense. To play the game, all you need is a ball. 
I agree, but basketball is all about travel/AAU teams now as well.
DougBH
1123
And how many Hispanic NBA players do we have, proportionate to their population? Should they be ethnic group normalized?
1 Like
This makes no sense.
To get to the NBA you have to be extremely athletic or tall. Ideally both. Same with Skill positions in NFL.
You don’t make to the NBA/NFL by nepotism.
Samm
1125
You are right. It’s by ability to jump. 
[quote=“SneakySFDude, post:163, topic:242930, full:true”]

Tguns:

bigtwnvin:
The left’s boundaries for “diversity” are racist and use color as a tool for divisiveness and hate.
[/quote]
I’ll say it plainly, the lefts idea of diversity and inclusion ends where ideals, beliefs or even thought diverge from their own.
…it then becomes racist, fascist, or any of a variety of phobic they choose to label it that particular day.
“Not authentic”
Here’s this from another college:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/new-york-college-segregates-faculty-and-staff-by-race-for-year-long-antiracism-institute/ar-AA12ZYJR?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=b3214b191d174d84934566e18e60aba2
1 Like

WuWei:
When they say “diversity”, they don’t mean diversity of thought. Vocabulary, not dictionary.
It is a demand for power disproportionate to share of population. In “our” democracy, some identity groups should have more hegemony.
Based on the least indicative character traits of all.
And the libs crying about the SCOTUS decision is another example of the negative effects of diversity.
2 Likes