Yes, I believe any President challenged by a citizen on their eligibility in court should have to prove their eligibility. Either that or remove those eligibility requirements as pointless and unenforceable.
How quickly we forget that McCain’s eligibility was questioned seriously enough to warrant congress weighing in with a meaningless proclamation that he was. Did he have a funny name?
So your’e saying your birth certificate has never been in front of a court to test its veracity. Welll, until you can prove that, I don’t think your words have much weight here, as you’re undocumented and don’t get a say.
This thread gives a fun peek back Into how disgusting some of these people were while Obama was president. A gracious intelligent hard working family man - he introduced some controversial policies and that was worth debating. But so many were (and are) mired in the slime pit. “Mother …”…”Kenyan”…”gay crackhead”…”wasn’t born here”…”is only popular/elected because he’s black”…”he’s only half black”…
I’m retrospect it’s no huge shock they reacted by electing the human personification of every disgusting base impulse Obama triggered deep inside them all of those years.
Ballot access laws? Oh you mean the foxes guarding the henhouse. Just allow members of their own party, who have a vested interest in their election, to certify them as eligible. No thanks. And before you say some of them were republicans, I’ll just point out they had a vested interest in not kicking the matter up as their own candidate as well as some of their future hopefuls had problems in this area.
So why did this suddenly become an issue with Obama, and not literally all of his predecessors?
And we’ve already been down the “proving eligibility” rabbit hole. Far right Arizona Sec of State, at the time, Ken Bennett chased the rabbit and was satisfied: