The concept that a robot could evaluate quality of ingredients and final product is a flaw none of this addresses.
Do you have something that does not come from a RW Hayek/Mises/Friedman influenced Think tank?
Pssssst⦠the future is in robotic drag queens.

The number of experienced entrepreneurs
Thatās just it. I just had a conversation with someone about this very matter.
You HAVE to spend time in the hole to learn what an industry is lacking and what it is doing right. Only then, can you find ways to improve what is lacking if you are inventive.
Then, you have to do your research to see what the demand and viability of it is.
Perspective:
Family auto the next big thing
Suburban homes the next big thing
TVs the next big thing
Fast Food the next big thing
Cell phones the next big thing
Etc.
There really truly legitimately ALWAYS is a
the next big thing.
The difference now is not there
that there is, gor tge furst time ever a the next big thing that will change all our lives.
(That happens again and again)
The difference is that this time there is so much Fed funny money, around that tulpps, and phony e-coins and monkey jpegs and ⦠a whole lotta bad business ideas with not-yet-ready managers are getting funded.
Itās like MBS onky with venture capital.

The difference is that this time there is so much Fed funny money, around that tulpps, and phony e-coins and monkey jpegs and ⦠a whole lotta bad business ideas with not-yet-ready managers are getting funded.
The āI can sell you a bridgeā syndrome?
I like new ideas. I support them. However, it must be viable. How many years of experience in an industry? How will this improve things? Show me how it will if terms of dollars so I will invest.
Really, it comes down to people loaning money who donāt know how to figure these things out. Itās only going to get worse given our dumbed down education system

Really, it comes down to people loaning money who donāt know how to figure these things out.
I cannit prove people (including VCs) are dumber now than before. I can prove tgey no longer have choose between ten ideas and fund the best two, they now have enough Fed-pribted helicopter money to fund all ten.
They are funding risky schemes they never would have funded two QEs ago.
Same deal with IPOs etc.
This is the definition of a bubble economy.