61

Markey said they introduced it.

62

Apparently I don’t. This must be part of that super nefarious deep state plan I keep hearing about.

63

Just politics.

64

THEY (Markey’s press release) said they introduced it. I was repeating their words.

Take up their wording with them.

2 Likes
65

Is that a thing now? Please point out where I used the word fake.

66

The implication was there with your words of “If this were actual legislation”.

Just stop while you are behind.

1 Like
67

Very strong implication.

1 Like
68

Lots of frogs out there thinking they are happily sitting in a spa.

2 Likes
69

I’m interested to see what the enforcement could possibly be in this proposed legislation. There is no way that I can see to get total adherence.

70

Hard to know without seeing an actual bill, isn’t it?

71

Yes. A huge implication that an introduced bill couldn’t actually be read because it hasn’t actually been introduced yet. I’m not sure how that equals fake, but hey whatevs. Until it’s been introduced is it actually legislation?

1 Like
72

Assuming it even passes in order to not work in the first place.

73

According to the article, it’s not about enforcement. That would be up to the States. This is a carrot, not a stick. Supposedly.

74

That is the next phase.

1 Like
75

They aren’t encouraging YOU to do anything. They’re encouraging the States to make you do it in exchange for funding. And that’s if it even says that and IF it passes.

76

Why are you so upset?

77

Weird. Considering they said they already tried that and it didn’t work.

78

Force by proxy. Interesting.

1 Like
79

Upset? Please. I’m still trying to figure out what I’m supposed to be afraid of.

80

No “they” didn’t.