Andrew McCabe: 25th Amendment was discussed by Justice Department to remove Trump from office

People that want smaller govt. should find a smaller country. :wink:

30,000 remaining ISIS fighers must be getting claustrophobic in that hut.

The DOJ and FBI are liars out to get Trump who has a proven record of honesty and whos only crime was to win the presidency.

-Trumper logic

Right. “D” v “R”

Nope. Just McCabe and Strzok.

No ‘‘black’’ V ‘‘white’’

1 Like

Well they are both gone now, so we good then?

Well of course we would have heard "this has never been done until this President…what is different about this President? But we heard that one all the time anyway.

It’s the dog whistle for why Obama was unfit because there was no other reason. Who are you kidding.

Oh please. It was the ploy to avoid every criticism of his actions. People were opposed to him because they didn’t agree with his actions…just like Trump hatred.

Who are you talking to?

Some where opposed to his policies.others to his race…some who did it because of his race used dog whistles…

No, he didn’t.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384.
If two or more persons in anyState or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United Statescontrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

The problem with Sedition is that invoking the 25th is outlined in the constitution. Thus making invocation of the 25th amendment legal and therefore not not…by definition Sedition.

Unless you are telling me that this part of the constitution you do not support?

No the question is…is it legal for them to discuss the invocation of the 25th amendment…and it is. No sedition!

Well duh…and if trump brought it to court he would get laughed out and then you would see the judge being a deep state lackey…till it got to scotus and they laughed as well and didnt bother to take it…

Truly, without his inherited wealth and power, and the ability to con people along the way as a result, Donny would be like the BSing drunk at the end of the bar everybody ignores and shakes their head at.

2 Likes

“It’s good to see someone concerned about the questionable actions of the President”

like Hillary letting the Chinese in her private server and Strzok’s doing nothing about when warned.

Oh…and now Obama’s policies make him unfit for office and he should removed immediately not at the next election as is usual. :roll_eyes:

Again, who are you kidding.

Good thing Hillary didn’t collude with the Russians to throw the election, wait she did.

I have heard of a privet hedge…but never a privet server. I think you meant private right.

1 Like