Why are they lying?
So odd that someone who is so stuck on sticking to the explicit, plain and unabridged meaning of “shall not infringe” is making up requirements for the 25th.
2 Likes
No it couldn’t. It couldn’t mean “You fired our friend!”
I’m not making up anything.
If a majority of the cabinet and 2/3 of congress agree, YES IT ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ CAN.
Yes it could.
It is for congress to decide the validity of the submission.
No it can’t.
Show your work. What recourse would there be? It’s a political process.
Answer my question first.
No, it couldn’t. Firing the FBI Director is fulfilling his duties.
No, I asked mine first.
Please don’t defend seditionists.
Revolution.
Lol, the ■■■■■■■ irony is rich. You’re Poeing is.
Guys, the recourse to a constitutional mechanism which some are claiming is seditious and traitorous, is…revolution—which actually is the definition of sedition and treason.
1 Like
I don’t know what that means.
I mean every word I post.
The mechanism is not sedition, the plotting is.
“Plotting”. The mechanism can’t come about without the “plotting”. Otherwise how else do you ■■■■■■■ know if there’s a majority of the cabinet who agree?
1 Like
Of course it can. Where in the 25th does it require plotting?
Those two traitors didn’t need to know.
Let’s wear a wire!
No you didn’t.
I asked mine way back in the thread.
Answer my question about the Radical Republicans…seditionists or not?
Person A: “Hey, do you think there’s a majority of cabinet members who would invoke the 25th?”
Person B: “Eh, doubt it.”
Person C-RAZY: “Seditious plotting!!”
1 Like
