It seems to me that Washington D.C. was acting like an unhinged lunatic long before President Trump took office. So we must ask ourselves, was D.C. the unhinged lunatic in trying to unseat a duly elected President without an impeachment process?
They haven’t jumped past anyone since they only brought up the subject. They were looking into it, and not making a final determination. As professionals in the government, they would and should have every right to do that as part of their job.
Talking about whether or not the 25th Amendment needed to be reviewed by Cabinet members is hardly unconstitutional. It is in the actual constitution. And it was talk that never progressed beyond the discussion phase of inquiry.
It’s not if I say so, or you say so. It is what we know the facts to be at this juncture. Should the facts as known change, then maybe the discussion changes. But as of now, none of this was unconstitutional.
They did not seek to originate anything. Where did you get that from? They had/have no power to invoke the 25th. They have every right in the world to discuss it though. They even have the right to bring up their concerns direct to the VP and the Cabinet, who could originate it if deemed necessary.
We’re they actually starting the process? If they had enough evidence to present to the cabinet and the VP, and they began 25th amendment processes, would that still be wrong in your opinion?