I didnt bother listening after that first line…He might as well be a CEC talking head.
Well maybe their campaign mail should not be as spammy.
“One email sent by the re-election campaign of Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) lists its sender as “Reservation Confirmation,” with the subject line “FLIGHT NUMBER: 8341.” The message itself states the former president has “invited you to join him for a private dinner at Mar-a-Lago!””
Google is correctly filtering Spam garbage mail to the Spam folder. If republicans don’t want their emails sent to the Spam folder then they need to quit sending people Spam.
Reading verbatim other people’s news articles is not “independent” nor is it “journalism”
I didnt bother listening after that first line…He might as well be a CEC talking head.
K…I wouldn’t either because it totally exposes what libs have denied for years…big tech censorship on a massive scale
Gmail algorithm
What do think it was about GOP emails that triggered the Gmail algorithm? Until we know we’re just taking guesses.
Well maybe their campaign mail should not be as spammy.
I get them all the time asking to donate money and have a chance to have dinner with Trump or some other gimmick. That has nothing to do with this. Since you approve though, will you still when Musk takes over Twitter?
Of al of the things that I thought people would not get upset about… is getting less spam asking for money.
That has nothing to do with this
No it has everything to do with this. Republicans keep sending nonsense garbage mail to people and Google is correctly filtering it where it should go. The same place offers from Nigerian princes who are going to offer you a billion dollars but you have to sign over everything you own in your life to them.
takes over Twitter?
When Elon Musk officially owns Twitter, it will be his toy to do with as he pleases. Twitter will still be a private corporation and they are free to censor or not censor people as they please on their own platform.
Of al of the things that I thought people would not get upset about… is getting less spam asking for money.
Then turn about is fair play IYO…correct? You’ll never say a word if this happens on Twitter going forward…correct?
When Elon Musk officially owns Twitter, it will be his toy to do with as he pleases. Twitter will still be a private corporation and they are free to censor or not censor people as they please on their own platform.
Now…hold that thought and let’s come back to it towards November.
Jezcoe:Of al of the things that I thought people would not get upset about… is getting less spam asking for money.
Then turn about is fair play IYO…correct? You’ll never say a word if this happens on Twitter going forward…correct?
It is their playground… their rules.
And to drive that home.
It has always been about private platforms being able to regulate the speech on it however they wish. You will not see me complaining about how Musk decides to regulate the speech on Twitter because it is his playground so it is his rules.
Smyrna: Jezcoe:Of al of the things that I thought people would not get upset about… is getting less spam asking for money.
Then turn about is fair play IYO…correct? You’ll never say a word if this happens on Twitter going forward…correct?
It is their playground… their rules.
And to drive that home.
Twitter Stock Leaps Amid Reports Board In Takeover Talks With Elon Musk - #262 by Jezcoe
Well it’s nice you are being consistent, other elected democrats not so much. They are now calling for regulation.
well not “censorship” per se just anything they disagree with that might appear on some widely accessible medium
I think it’s a fascinating and challenging question.
I am all for free speech. I am not for amplifying lies.
Who decides? How do you practically stop one without the other in this internet based society?
It’s hard…
But a question for you - do you think deleting posts that are obvious lies is censorship?
I think of censorship as say not letting someone voice their opinion.
I view restricting presenting lies as facts as house keeping…
But it’s complicated for sure.
Feel free. My position won’t change.
thinkingman:well not “censorship” per se just anything they disagree with that might appear on some widely accessible medium
I think it’s a fascinating and challenging question.
I am all for free speech. I am not for amplifying lies.
Who decides? How do you practically stop one without the other in this internet based society?
It’s hard…
But a question for you - do you think deleting posts that are obvious lies is censorship?
I think of censorship as say not letting someone voice their opinion.
I view restricting presenting lies as facts as house keeping…
But it’s complicated for sure.
Would you want oh say Donald Trump deciding what is true and what isn’t?
Would you want oh say Donald Trump deciding what is true and what isn’t?
Just because the problem is complicated doesn’t mean we have to give up and let the liars do what they want.
Justifying your hypocrisy.
Tell me libs…what’s ministry of truth for?
zantax:Would you want oh say Donald Trump deciding what is true and what isn’t?
Just because the problem is complicated doesn’t mean we have to give up and let the liars do what they want.
Lies have existed far longer than this country has, the answer to lies is truth, not censorship.
Just because the problem is complicated doesn’t mean we have to give up and let the liars do what they want.
You didn’t have a problem with those lies about Russian collusion, lies being told by your president Biden…or Obama.
In yet another sign of Big Tech bias, it turns out Google’s Gmail program leans strongly Democratic — automatically sending Republican fund-raising mail to users’ spam folders far more often than the Democratic ones in the runup to the 2020 elections.
Trying to influence how people think, eh? Sway an election? How dare they. That’s the media’s job to manipulate human cattle!