I oppose the murder of unborn children, or as liberals euphemisticaly call it, abortion. I’ve said many times it’s just a means that allows people to have sex with whoever, whenever they want without regard to consequence. The justification for this murder is that it’s the woman’s body and no one but her should have control over her body. I’ve long asserted that except in cases of rape, a woman has total control over her body, what she lacks is SELF control, the unwillingness to excercise that self control to abstain from sex to begin with. The liberal response to my suggestion is usually that it is totally unrealistic to expect men and women to not engage in sex and even oppose teaching abstinence to our kids in high school. Abstinence is the only 100 percent way to prevent pregnancy and thus eliminate the need for and number of abortions.
I’m absolutely amazed then by the call by liberal spokesperson Alyssa Milano for women to ABSTAIN FROM SEX, until the full rights to unfettered murder of unborn children are returned to all women in the US. But WAIT A MINUTE… I thought abstinence was unrealistic and impossible??? When there is no consequence it is, but when there may be consequences there isn’t?? Which is it?