61

Now they’re murdering the store’s guards.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/smash-and-grab-thieves-attack-stores-around-the-country-california-security-guard-shot-dead-as-crime-rages/ar-AARe0Ee?ocid=msedgntp

1 Like
62

The group of eight robbers stole hammers, crowbars and other tools, swiping about $400 worth of merchandise. Such tools have been used in other smash-and-grab robberies in the state, including in a Nordstrom in Walnut Creek, California, last week.

Ahhhhhhhhh…it’s only $400 worth. That’s of no concern in California.

1 Like
63

Petite larceny.

64

…tools to be used at a later date, to steal even more.

65

Talk about being dishonest about what is happening.

1 Like
66

:ok_hand::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

67

You are welcome.

68

Where San Fran or LA?

69

Right here in Hannity Land.

1 Like
70

Defund police. In Dallas, as many major Dem controlled cities, the DA won’t prosecute theft under a certain dollar amount but if you tried to stop the theft you might be charged as a vigilante. Since the DA won’t charge, the police won’t get involved. A neighbor recently traced their iPad using the “find” function to an apartment but the police would do nothing.
Is it surprising that this sends a message to looters (oops, you’re not supposed to say “looter” now. It’s racist).

3 Likes
71

When they close that will be labeled modern redlining, thus proving CRT is right and capitalism is racist.

2 Likes
72

Okie which part is dishonest. The three people who were arrested recently for a Nordstrom smash and grab what were they charged with.

This isn’t hard

73

Our neighborhood blogs are filled with images of “porch pirates”.

74

Yep and those doing this crap also knows that so they keep what they steal under that amount.

So, as a result they aren’t getting nailed for grand larceny.

1 Like
75

Well no they are grabbing thousands of dollar da worth of items from luxury boutiques.

76

The part you said people were conflating stuff. It is not hard. You know they don’t arrest them under a certain amount you admitted to it. You tried to covers libs policies by “see they arrested someone” knowing full well why they arrested them and not others. Pure intentional dishonesty.

1 Like
77

Could you direct us to some of the pending cases so we can watch this in practice?

1 Like
78

There is a difference between petit larceny and grand larceny.

You guys are conflating the sf decision with the rest of the state.

Oh and Soros is a special gem

79

…cept there were approximately 80.

1 Like
80

Yes

The great googly moogly. I read it in the New York post.