An example of why society is getting more and more coarse and disrespectful

Oryx · 2019-09-17T21:05:36.482Z

Guvnah:

No, it’s not THE “why”.

I specifically chose to say AN EXAMPLE OF.

Yes, you used it as an example of “why” society is “coarse and disrespectful.”

Guvnah:

Where did I say it’s “why”??

lol

Guvnah · 2019-09-17T21:06:17.141Z

Oryx:

Then what in the world are you referring to?

You’re getting tiresome.

Oryx · 2019-09-17T21:06:39.665Z

Guvnah:

You’re getting tiresome.

I bet!

Cynic · 2019-09-17T21:07:24.769Z

You gave no trashing

You think a couple teenage boys running across a field is noteworthy? Geeez.

Guvnah · 2019-09-17T21:07:50.598Z

Oryx:

Yes, you used it as an example of “why” society is “coarse and disrespectful.”

Right. And the post I responded to said: “this one incident is why”

Big difference from “an example of…”

Reading comprehension, man. Reading comprehension.

Guvnah · 2019-09-17T21:09:07.731Z

Cynic:

You gave no trashing

You said that.

I didn’t.

Reading comprehension, man.

Cynic · 2019-09-17T21:10:09.548Z

Yeah, it’s really bad, you can’t even read your own posts

Guvnah:

in response to the thrashing you have received.

Guvnah · 2019-09-17T21:27:51.410Z

Cynic:

Yeah, it’s really bad, you can’t even read your own posts

Or you can’t read mine.

I didn’t say trashing. You even quoted what I actually said.

Guvnah · 2019-09-17T21:33:56.571Z

Oryx:

Since personal attacks are all you have left, I accept your surrender.

Reading comprehension.

I showed you a very clear distinction between what I responded to (which wasn’t even your post), and what you were pretending I responded to.

Reading comprehension would have spared you needing that explained to you. It’s not a personal attack. Truth may hurt, but you can’t take truth as an attack. I’m trying to help you here!

If you think it’s a personal attack, by all means, flag it.

Cynic · 2019-09-17T21:37:05.798Z

missed the h on this mobile phone; is that really all you got?

Guvnah · 2019-09-17T21:41:22.552Z

Cynic:

missed the h on this mobile phone; is that really all you got?

Reading comprehension.

You “missed” it twice. I don’t believe your excuse.

And it’s all your contribution to this thread deserved.

The libs are really mad now. Desperate and mad!

Cynic · 2019-09-17T21:42:41.953Z

If catching typos are your big victories, go for it

Cynic · 2019-09-17T21:47:09.366Z

But then you are the kind of guy who thinks a couple teenage boys should be assaulted, and their parents shamed… for being teenage boys…

LucyLou · 2019-09-17T23:39:39.419Z

Guvnah:

The libs are really mad now. Desperate and mad!

Where?

LucyLou · 2019-09-17T23:40:50.015Z

The conz in this thread are mad. And desperate!

Plasmaball · 2019-09-18T02:55:57.663Z

You think it’s that simple?
I know plenty of adults who have had strict up bringings and turned out to be hot messes…

Why do you think some men like a woman who was a catholic girl?

CanadianJudo · 2019-09-18T03:07:56.710Z

Maybe Baby Boomers shouldn’t have raised idiots.

CanadianJudo · 2019-09-18T03:08:40.661Z

I grew up in Catholic school place was a zoo.

Plasmaball · 2019-09-18T03:17:15.918Z

That’s because they are spoiled idiots

Samson_Corwell · 2019-09-18T09:53:02.315Z

Guvnah:

MSN

Two kids ran out on a football field in the middle of the game. A coach tackled the kid in front. The kid’s parents want to see the coach fired.

Regardless of the level of the competition, (pro, college or high school), it’s forbidden to run out in the middle of the game. Invariably someone (usually a security guy or a cop) tackles the offender. In fact, in the moment of the incident it’s really the only way to stop the offender. And usually the offender faces some sort of penalty – sometimes even criminal.

But here, the parents want the coach fired. In a small way it’s the same as when a cop uses force to subdue a criminal. “I don’t care if my kid was wrong. You are wrong-er for stopping him.”

It’s time to stop coddling miscreants and their misbehavior.

No. The coach needs to be fired. It’s not “coddling” to respond proportionally.