He said people, not households. Your numbers are wrong.
Allof your statement is true and I would add
We certanly do need campaign finance reform, and on such a large scale.
In the age of SuperPACS I am not sure how it can be done or how much good it will do but that is no reaosn not to try.
As long as a PAC or other group is ostensibly not coordinating with a candidate, anyone can form a shell group, call it “Families for a Better Tomorrow” or whatever, and run ads supporting a candidate.
For you maybe…
3 Likes
You totally ignore/missed my point. Not sure if it’s out of ignorance or on purpose.
I was mocking your point.
Yeah, he also wrote $1,000,000 and I wrote $52,925.
But it seems to have gone over your head.
1 Like
Sure you were…
What he meant to say was “on purpose.” 
1 Like
He is not tickling his fancy and he is not striking back after all those unneeded insults… ( and horrible ones )…
So what would you call it?
Mild restraint? The opposite of ignore. He hasn’t taken actual action against him, so that’s something.
Too many times we’ve seen what happens when these college “educated” libs try to perform basic math. Too many. 
3 Likes
It’s more kabuki theatre to placate the far left.
You know, the ones burning his Tesla dealerships down. He wants to look reasonable in order to get the violence to stop.
Other than that, the only parties that will really get hurt are the minority parties in the US. Ross Perot’s movement eventually fizzled out, and I suspect this will too.
When’s the last time a Tesla dealership was burned to the ground and would those people be satisfied by a new political party formed by Elon because Trump didn’t cut enough spending in his bill?
1 Like
Right before he left DOGE IMHO.
And you know the line…“The enemy of my enemy is my friend”. If he’s opposing Trump, the left will love him no matter what. Look what happened to Dick Cheney. 
LW talking point.
No its not. The advent of the internet and instant communications changed the way politics operates.
We get it…in your world, there are no verifiable facts, only RW or LW talking points. You live in a sad place.
1 Like
Yes (or no) epending on how ya count stimmies, PPP loans . . . etc…
If we include “emergncy spending” (funny how there are neer any emergency cuts) in the depths of COVID then yes, in recent years R’s have outspent D’s.
If we back those out, gving a reasonable view of their everyday habits, both spend too much and the D’s spend more.
If we keep harping on the second part, (who spends more), we’ll never address the first part, (we spend too much.)
1 Like
No, just LW talking points. What you call “RW talking points” they call “truth.”
