You mocked the movie as follows:
Where is the mockery. Which part of that post mocked the movie?
The sound you are hearing by the way isn’t of freedom it’s of you … losing the plot
I have made no comment on the movie except to say it was an okay political thriller. Not sure what you are trying to prove.
$110 million is great for the movie and crossing the $100m mark is an achievement. Though I suspect the clever pay it forward strategy helped.
Getting back to the subject of the thread involving the film, “No Way Back: The Reality of Gender-Affirming Care” ___ a film which highlights the ugly and distressing side of so-called “Gender-Affirming Care” ___ is it not a fact that part of our sexual deviant crowd, The Queer Trans Project, pressured AMC into not showing the film, and then boasted about their success saying the following?
“We did it! Our community’s swift action is a testament to the power of advocacy and the importance of raising our voices against harmful content,” LINK?
.
Why is this sexual deviant group so determined to prevent the showing of a film, which highlights the ugly and distressing side of so-called “Gender-Affirming Care”?

Getting back to the subject of the thread involving the film, “No Way Back: The Reality of Gender-Affirming Care” ___ a film which highlights the ugly and distressing side of so-called “Gender-Affirming Care” ___ is it not a fact that part of our sexual deviant crowd, The Queer Trans Project, pressured AMC into not showing the film, and then boasted about their success saying the following?
“We did it! Our community’s swift action is a testament to the power of advocacy and the importance of raising our voices against harmful content,” LINK?
.
Why is this sexual deviant group so determined to prevent the showing of a film, which highlights the ugly and distressing side of so-called “Gender-Affirming Care”?
No one on this forum can answer this. Ask that question directly to them on X or send them an email.

johnwk2:
Getting back to the subject of the thread involving the film, “No Way Back: The Reality of Gender-Affirming Care” ___ a film which highlights the ugly and distressing side of so-called “Gender-Affirming Care” ___ is it not a fact that part of our sexual deviant crowd, The Queer Trans Project, pressured AMC into not showing the film, and then boasted about their success saying the following?
“We did it! Our community’s swift action is a testament to the power of advocacy and the importance of raising our voices against harmful content,” LINK?
.
Why is this sexual deviant group so determined to prevent the showing of a film, which highlights the ugly and distressing side of so-called “Gender-Affirming Care”?
No one on this forum can answer this. Ask that question directly to them on X or send them an email.
Pretty much…

Nemesis:
Apprently cons dont go to the movies anymore so a boycott of AMC is not going to work.
AMC can decide what movies to show/not show. Its not a free speech issue like someone in the article alluded to.
By the way…Sound of Freedom has made nearly $131 million at the box office
If all movies had a Pay it Forward scheme and an audience of compliant sheep, they’d all make that kind of money.
Sound of Freedom made money the same way politicians can write ■■■■■■ books that instantly become best sellers.
Bulk buying by people with deep pockets (with the aforementioned Pay it Forward scheme to boot).

johnwk2:
Getting back to the subject of the thread involving the film, “No Way Back: The Reality of Gender-Affirming Care” ___ a film which highlights the ugly and distressing side of so-called “Gender-Affirming Care” ___ is it not a fact that part of our sexual deviant crowd, The Queer Trans Project, pressured AMC into not showing the film, and then boasted about their success saying the following?
“We did it! Our community’s swift action is a testament to the power of advocacy and the importance of raising our voices against harmful content,” LINK?
.
Why is this sexual deviant group so determined to prevent the showing of a film, which highlights the ugly and distressing side of so-called “Gender-Affirming Care”?
No one on this forum can answer this.
How can you make that assertion, and especially when one reason has already been presented? Perhaps you ought to spend a little more time studying what has been presented, rather than offering your kneejerk pontifications.
JWK
If the Chinese Communist Party leadership promised to forgive todays woke generation’s student loans, would they vote for a Communist Party Leadership?

Apprently cons dont go to the movies anymore so a boycott of AMC is not going to work.
Where did you come up with that gratuitous assertion?

Sound of Freedom made money the same way politicians can write ■■■■■■ books that instantly become best sellers
Interesting. I call bull ka ka
We are told all the time that nothing hollywood puts out is worth watching.

Nemesis:
johnwk2:
Getting back to the subject of the thread involving the film, “No Way Back: The Reality of Gender-Affirming Care” ___ a film which highlights the ugly and distressing side of so-called “Gender-Affirming Care” ___ is it not a fact that part of our sexual deviant crowd, The Queer Trans Project, pressured AMC into not showing the film, and then boasted about their success saying the following?
“We did it! Our community’s swift action is a testament to the power of advocacy and the importance of raising our voices against harmful content,” LINK?
.
Why is this sexual deviant group so determined to prevent the showing of a film, which highlights the ugly and distressing side of so-called “Gender-Affirming Care”?
No one on this forum can answer this.
How can you make that assertion, and especially when one reason has already been presented? Perhaps you ought to spend a little more time studying what has been presented, rather than offering your kneejerk pontifications.
JWK
If the Chinese Communist Party leadership promised to forgive todays woke generation’s student loans, would they vote for a Communist Party Leadership?
Not really, cant say i am that interested more than a few minutes of posting in what they have to say or the fact AMC is not showing it.

JayJay:
Sound of Freedom made money the same way politicians can write ■■■■■■ books that instantly become best sellers
Interesting. I call bull ka ka
Again when you actually read the news instead of the spin, it’s plain as day.
And the movie itself isn’t about how sexy trafficking really is…it’s a bad TV fanatasy episode of how sex trafficking actually is.

Nemesis:
Apprently cons dont go to the movies anymore so a boycott of AMC is not going to work.
Where did you come up with that gratuitous assertion?
When all else fails, create your own narrative
JWK
. Would you rather have twenty-five FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES in your pocket, or five UNITED STATES DOLLARS, and why?
Weird but okay.

Weird but okay.
I believe “patently disingenuous” better describes absurd inuendoes when posted, which are designed to obfuscate, instigate and agitate.
JWK
If the Chinese Communist Party leadership promised to forgive todays woke generation’s student loans, would they vote for a Communist Party Leadership?

Nemesis:
Weird but okay.
I believe “patently disingenuous” better describes absurd inuendoes when posted, which are designed to obfuscate, instigate and agitate.
JWK
If the Chinese Communist Party leadership promised to forgive todays woke generation’s student loans, would they vote for a Communist Party Leadership?
I am not responsible for how you to choose to feel/react to a post I make.
Nothing absurd about my post but please carry on I am intrigued by this thread.

johnwk2:
Nemesis:
Weird but okay.
I believe “patently disingenuous” better describes absurd inuendoes when posted, which are designed to obfuscate, instigate and agitate.
JWK
If the Chinese Communist Party leadership promised to forgive todays woke generation’s student loans, would they vote for a Communist Party Leadership?
I am not responsible for how you to choose to feel/react to a post I make.
Nothing absurd about my post but please carry on I am intrigued by this thread.
Oh come now Nemesis. Your post HERE, in which you asserted "cons dont go to the movies anymore ", and which bigtwnvin responded to, was most certainly absurd.
JWK
There is no surer way to weaken, subdue and bring to its knees a prosperous and freedom loving country than by flooding it with deadly drugs, an inflated currency and the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, and criminal populations of other countries.

LucyLou:
Bud Light! Target!
Weren’t they throwing Keurig coffee makers off cliffs a few years ago? And boycotting the NFL?
Ah, yes, I discovered three types of boycotters. One didn’t support the NFL, but he supported Tom Brady and continued to watch. Another was my BIL. He was gonna boycott, but on Sundays he went to his buddy’s house to watch the Washington games and drink beer. And the third (RIP, Mike!) was totally boycotting, yet I never knew of him to watch a single football game in his life.

Nemesis:
johnwk2:
Nemesis:
Weird but okay.
I believe “patently disingenuous” better describes absurd inuendoes when posted, which are designed to obfuscate, instigate and agitate.
JWK
If the Chinese Communist Party leadership promised to forgive todays woke generation’s student loans, would they vote for a Communist Party Leadership?
I am not responsible for how you to choose to feel/react to a post I make.
Nothing absurd about my post but please carry on I am intrigued by this thread.
Oh come now Nemesis. Your post HERE, in which you asserted "cons dont go to the movies anymore ", and which bigtwnvin responded to, was most certainly absurd.
JWK
There is no surer way to weaken, subdue and bring to its knees a prosperous and freedom loving country than by flooding it with deadly drugs, an inflated currency and the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, and criminal populations of other countries.
Lmao I love how pedantic this forum is. It was a figure of speech. Not to be taken literally that every single American in the United States who identifies as conservative do not go to the movies.
The pedantry is laughable.