Amber Guyger sentencing

[Camp]

It is a moral finding that human life is greater than a reckless action that can cause loss of human life.

[DisturbedGuy]

@WuWei

@DisturbedGuy

@WuWei

@Camp

Another case of manslaughter IMO. Mistake that should never happen.

Error is normal. You expect perfection in humans?

When it comes to taking another person’s life, yes.

Error is normal. Even the best make mistakes.

Sure, but in the case if murder, there is a price pay mistake or not.

[WuWei]

@Supreme_War_Pig

Yes…we might not like the results, but yes.

Yes it’s working?

[WuWei]

@Camp

All about order and justice…illusory if you will.

Order I will agree with.

[WuWei]

@Camp

It is a moral finding that human life is greater than a reckless action that can cause loss of human life.

What was “reckless” about it?

[WuWei]

@DisturbedGuy

Sure, but in the case if murder, there is a price pay mistake or not.

I know. My question is why?

[Camp]

Situational awareness.

[WuWei]

@Camp

Situational awareness.

Meaningless term. They were both completely aware of the situation as they understood it in the moment.

[WuWei]

Is “holding people accountable” the accountable as in balancing the books or as in telling the account?

Are we “holding then accountable” or responsible? What’s the difference?

[Camp]

One of the classes I had was the philosophy of law. It was quite enjoyable.

All of our morality and common law can be traced back to canonical doctrine.

https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/tpavone/files/philosophy_of_law_outline.pdf

There really aren’t any hard and fast answers.

[WuWei]

I think we can go back further than that

I’m not looking for any. I already know the “hard and fast answers”.

[Camp]

Right. I just laugh at the atheists’ that throw their faith into the law. Same ■■■■ different day.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

What was “reckless” about it?

Is this a joke?

She admitted she intended to kill.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

What was “reckless” about it?

Is this a joke?

She admitted she intended to kill.

Not at all.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

Not at all.

She admitted it.

The guy was unarmed. Posed no threat.

[WuWei]

Before or after she shot him?

“believing him to be an intruder in her home.”

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@WuWei

@Supreme_War_Pig

Yes…we might not like the results, but yes.

Yes it’s working?

Yes it is working. People are being tried and punished.

[Toll_Collector]

@Tom_Ch

Doesn’t matter intent. She cause his death.

Sort of like if you are Involve in robbery. You may not have shot someone. But if your partner does, you’re still responsible.

I have to break ranks and agree with you 100%. You are responsible for what you do. I don’t care what you meant.

[WuWei]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@WuWei

@Supreme_War_Pig

Yes…we might not like the results, but yes.

Yes it’s working?

Yes it is working. People are being tried and punished.

And that’s your evidence it’s “working”? What happens to them after?

[WuWei]

@Supreme_War_Pig

Yes it is working. People are being tried and punished.

Highest per capita incarceration rate in the world. It’s “working”?