Amazon demands in-person voting for union election

thinkingman · 2021-01-26T14:17:29.827Z

biggestal99:

thinkingman:

no need to apologize i fully expect that from everyone who can’t address what really happened

it’s like watching the “news”

Facts are news (no quotation marks needed)

Allan

they sure are

but “news” organizations arent

biggestal99 · 2021-01-26T14:21:56.377Z

Bosun:

What exactly is your definition of facts Allan?

306 electoral votes cast for Biden vs 232 cast for Trump.

Stone cold fact

Allan

tnt · 2021-01-26T14:26:14.725Z

Smyrna:

There’s plenty of evidence of this but the sheople troughs won’t feed you this because then you may actually regurgibleat the truth…and the establishment shepherds can’t have that.

There is no evidence. That is why you resort to name calling.

If there was eveidnce, it would have been brought to court.

Smyrna · 2021-01-26T14:30:15.198Z

tnt:

There is no evidence. That is why you resort to name calling.

If there was eveidnce, it would have been brought to court.

There were 6,000 in one county alone. 6,000 Wake up!

tnt · 2021-01-26T14:58:25.757Z

Smyrna:

There were 6,000 in one county alone. 6,000 Wake up!

No, there wasn’t.

If there was, it would have been presented in court.

Wake up.

Smyrna · 2021-01-26T16:44:46.296Z

tnt:

No, there wasn’t.

If there was, it would have been presented in court.

Wake up.

Wow…you really are asleep. It was presented in court and the judge authorized a forensic analysis. It was done and the professional who did it determined that the Dominion system was designed with flaws. He allowed the release of the report and very quickly, the state of Michigan came in, took everything and said, there’s nothing to see here. You know, the same system that placed elderly people sick with COVID into uninfected nursing homes.

mlive – 6 Dec 20

Judge allows forensic investigation of voting equipment in Antrim County

The plaintiff in the lawsuit seeks to overturning of a marijuana proposal in the county.

https://www.9and10news.com/2020/12/14/analysis-of-antrim-county-ballot-machines-made-public/

FOX 2 Detroit

State officials dispute conclusion from newly-released audit of Antrim County...

Michigan officials are disputing the conclusions drawn from a forensic audit of voter equipment in one northern county that says the results shouldn't have been certified.

sikofit · 2021-01-26T16:54:03.574Z

PurpnGold:

Also did you notice that the majority of the cases cited by daily link were Republicans?

Actually I did notice that the majority of voter fraud seems to be committed by Republicans

sikofit · 2021-01-26T17:02:47.432Z

Smyrna:

Applying your brain power, name for me ANYTHING where 750,000 people all did something honestly, one…right after the other with no mistakes whether intentional or accidental?

Your proof of fraud is that a lot of people voted? Seriously???

Smyrna · 2021-01-26T17:39:30.643Z

sikofit:

Your proof of fraud is that a lot of people voted? Seriously???

I’m not in a position to verify one way or the other but that doesn’t mean I just take someone’s word for it? It doesn’t make sense and what I said applies and if you can name something that proves me wrong, do it? I don’t think you can? Name for me any example you can where 750,000 people did something and there was no fraud, no mistakes…everything went perfectly because that’s what those doing the hand count said.

sikofit · 2021-01-26T17:44:45.655Z

Smyrna:

Name for me any example you can where 750,000 people did something and there was no fraud, no mistakes…everything went perfectly because that’s what those doing the hand count said.

So you think we should throw out the results of an election simply because a lot of people voted?

Smyrna · 2021-01-26T17:48:32.708Z

sikofit:

So you think we should throw out the results of an election simply because a lot of people voted?

No. There’s a chance it was an honest election. I just want all aspects forensically inspected to determine that it was honest. When the inspection says NONE in 750,000? I say, I don’t trust you because logically, that’s almost impossible.

sikofit · 2021-01-26T17:51:57.535Z

Smyrna:

sikofit:

So you think we should throw out the results of an election simply because a lot of people voted?

No. There’s a chance it was an honest election. I just want all aspects forensically inspected to determine that it was honest. When the inspection says NONE in 750,000? I say, I don’t trust you because logically, that’s almost impossible.

And what happens when the inspection of the inspection comes up with the same results? How many times until you’re satisfied? And why aren’t you wanting any of the Congressional races investigated?

tnt · 2021-01-26T19:58:42.840Z

Smyrna:

No. There’s a chance it was an honest election. I just want all aspects forensically inspected to determine that it was honest. When the inspection says NONE in 750,000? I say, I don’t trust you because logically, that’s almost impossible.

Do you want SC, ND, FLA, OH, all foresically examined as well?

And by the way - any state where it was close was recounted. Sometimes by hand.

Bosun · 2021-01-27T03:14:40.895Z

Of course that is a great idea. When would be a good time to have auto recounts. I commend you for a great idea .

Bosun · 2021-01-27T03:16:24.720Z

Woke up. Trump is not President. Although I wish he was. God bless our Federal Republic . I personally pray for Citizen Trump’s return to Make America Great Again after the One Horse Pony Show.

Bosun · 2021-01-27T03:38:29.832Z

Maybe some people would support it if they did not like the outcome. However I would like to have full trust and confidence restored to our election process. Hope things get fixed by 2022.

Smyrna · 2021-01-27T09:57:26.724Z

sikofit:

And what happens when the inspection of the inspection comes up with the same results? How many times until you’re satisfied? And why aren’t you wanting any of the Congressional races investigated?

Who is doing the inspection and the methodology of it would determine whether or not I’m satisfied.

biggestal99 · 2021-01-27T10:10:44.328Z

Smyrna:

There’s a chance it was an honest election

Progress.

Allan

Toll_Collector · 2021-01-27T12:55:10.667Z

Smyrna:

I want everyone to vote who is a legal voter. Therefore…prove you’re a legal voter. I want anyone who chooses to drink alcohol to be able if, you’re of the legal drinking age, show your ID and prove it. I want anyone who wants to write a check, to be able to do so legally so, show your ID and prove you are who you say you are. Do you see how this works?

You mean those choosing to purchase alcohol need to prove it with ID. In most states you don’t need to be 21 to drink it.

Smyrna · 2021-01-27T12:57:02.319Z

Toll_Collector:

You mean those choosing to purchase alcohol need to prove it with ID. In most states you don’t need to be 21 to drink it.

Yes…your response is more accurate.