Amazon demands in-person voting for union election

Bosun · 2021-01-26T14:05:34.151Z

That is cool that you interviewed state official who led the effort. I am impressed Mr. Yankee.

tnt · 2021-01-26T14:07:26.373Z

Smyrna:

Oh…and nothing can happen in between? One says you are a registered legal voter and then when you cast your vote, you prove you are that person who was an approved registered voter. This really isn’t that complicated if…you truly want an honest election. Do you?

You have no evidence that we have not had an honest election.

Bosun · 2021-01-26T14:07:51.808Z

Uncommon sense may actually be nonsense, this is the world we are entering.

tnt · 2021-01-26T14:09:06.776Z

Smyrna:

Applying your brain power, name for me ANYTHING where 750,000 people all did something honestly, one…right after the other with no mistakes whether intentional or accidental? When you’re done looking for something that doesn’t exist, consider that some time ago, there was such a thing as common sense. This happened because people had to think for themselves. Everything wasn’t just fed to them, like it is today. Now…that sense…is uncommon. Maybe we should change the name to “uncommon sense”?

This is why the states did recounts and audits, and refined the final count.

Your concerns are shared. The systems in place have done everything you are asking for. You just don’t like the outcome, so you ignore the reality of the process already in place.

Bosun · 2021-01-26T14:09:10.488Z

What exactly is your definition of facts Allan?

Smyrna · 2021-01-26T14:10:13.948Z

tnt:

You have no evidence that we have not had an honest election.

There’s plenty of evidence of this but the sheople troughs won’t feed you this because then you may actually regurgibleat the truth…and the establishment shepherds can’t have that.

Bosun · 2021-01-26T14:10:27.430Z

That is 100% on point.

thinkingman · 2021-01-26T14:17:29.827Z

biggestal99:

thinkingman:

no need to apologize i fully expect that from everyone who can’t address what really happened

it’s like watching the “news”

Facts are news (no quotation marks needed)

Allan

they sure are

but “news” organizations arent

biggestal99 · 2021-01-26T14:21:56.377Z

Bosun:

What exactly is your definition of facts Allan?

306 electoral votes cast for Biden vs 232 cast for Trump.

Stone cold fact

Allan

tnt · 2021-01-26T14:26:14.725Z

Smyrna:

There’s plenty of evidence of this but the sheople troughs won’t feed you this because then you may actually regurgibleat the truth…and the establishment shepherds can’t have that.

There is no evidence. That is why you resort to name calling.

If there was eveidnce, it would have been brought to court.

Smyrna · 2021-01-26T14:30:15.198Z

tnt:

There is no evidence. That is why you resort to name calling.

If there was eveidnce, it would have been brought to court.

There were 6,000 in one county alone. 6,000 Wake up!

tnt · 2021-01-26T14:58:25.757Z

Smyrna:

There were 6,000 in one county alone. 6,000 Wake up!

No, there wasn’t.

If there was, it would have been presented in court.

Wake up.

Smyrna · 2021-01-26T16:44:46.296Z

tnt:

No, there wasn’t.

If there was, it would have been presented in court.

Wake up.

Wow…you really are asleep. It was presented in court and the judge authorized a forensic analysis. It was done and the professional who did it determined that the Dominion system was designed with flaws. He allowed the release of the report and very quickly, the state of Michigan came in, took everything and said, there’s nothing to see here. You know, the same system that placed elderly people sick with COVID into uninfected nursing homes.

mlive – 6 Dec 20

Judge allows forensic investigation of voting equipment in Antrim County

The plaintiff in the lawsuit seeks to overturning of a marijuana proposal in the county.

https://www.9and10news.com/2020/12/14/analysis-of-antrim-county-ballot-machines-made-public/

FOX 2 Detroit

State officials dispute conclusion from newly-released audit of Antrim County...

Michigan officials are disputing the conclusions drawn from a forensic audit of voter equipment in one northern county that says the results shouldn't have been certified.

sikofit · 2021-01-26T16:54:03.574Z

PurpnGold:

Also did you notice that the majority of the cases cited by daily link were Republicans?

Actually I did notice that the majority of voter fraud seems to be committed by Republicans

sikofit · 2021-01-26T17:02:47.432Z

Smyrna:

Applying your brain power, name for me ANYTHING where 750,000 people all did something honestly, one…right after the other with no mistakes whether intentional or accidental?

Your proof of fraud is that a lot of people voted? Seriously???

Smyrna · 2021-01-26T17:39:30.643Z

sikofit:

Your proof of fraud is that a lot of people voted? Seriously???

I’m not in a position to verify one way or the other but that doesn’t mean I just take someone’s word for it? It doesn’t make sense and what I said applies and if you can name something that proves me wrong, do it? I don’t think you can? Name for me any example you can where 750,000 people did something and there was no fraud, no mistakes…everything went perfectly because that’s what those doing the hand count said.

sikofit · 2021-01-26T17:44:45.655Z

Smyrna:

Name for me any example you can where 750,000 people did something and there was no fraud, no mistakes…everything went perfectly because that’s what those doing the hand count said.

So you think we should throw out the results of an election simply because a lot of people voted?

Smyrna · 2021-01-26T17:48:32.708Z

sikofit:

So you think we should throw out the results of an election simply because a lot of people voted?

No. There’s a chance it was an honest election. I just want all aspects forensically inspected to determine that it was honest. When the inspection says NONE in 750,000? I say, I don’t trust you because logically, that’s almost impossible.

sikofit · 2021-01-26T17:51:57.535Z

Smyrna:

sikofit:

So you think we should throw out the results of an election simply because a lot of people voted?

No. There’s a chance it was an honest election. I just want all aspects forensically inspected to determine that it was honest. When the inspection says NONE in 750,000? I say, I don’t trust you because logically, that’s almost impossible.

And what happens when the inspection of the inspection comes up with the same results? How many times until you’re satisfied? And why aren’t you wanting any of the Congressional races investigated?

tnt · 2021-01-26T19:58:42.840Z

Smyrna:

No. There’s a chance it was an honest election. I just want all aspects forensically inspected to determine that it was honest. When the inspection says NONE in 750,000? I say, I don’t trust you because logically, that’s almost impossible.

Do you want SC, ND, FLA, OH, all foresically examined as well?

And by the way - any state where it was close was recounted. Sometimes by hand.