An excuse for what?

Their ■■■■ lives because of their own choices.

Incorrect. When dealing with large crowds of people, many who don’t know each other, its absurd to condemn one group for the actions of an unrelated different group. Are you faulting them for having the moral courage to stay and protest for what they believe even if another group is trying to hijack the protest?

That makes no logical sense and is based on faulty assumptions.

It makes perfect sense, is completely logical and makes no assumptions at all.

You made the assumption that every single protester has a ■■■■ life, that they don’t have an excuse for why their lives are ■■■■ , and that they are afraid of that. That’s three assumptions. Any why would that lead to protesting police using excessive force against blacks?

I didn’t say anything about protestors.

The “they” I referred to in my response to TheRedComent were protesters who were “burning down businesses”. Which “they” did you think I was talking about and to whom you assumed have ■■■■ lives?

Business burners and looters.

Miserable ■■■■ lives

1 Like

More assumptions. Did you interview personally every “business burner” and looter to determine their motivations? I doubt it.

Also I put the looters and arsonists it two different categories. The people burning down businesses could be doing it out of protest or they could be doing it because they just want to destroy stuff. You can’t make any accurate assumption over their lives to know if they are ■■■■ or not.

Unless you are literally protesting the company, I wouldn’t classify the looters as protesters, they are probably people just taking advantage of the situation to get “free” stuff… but again, you can’t assume its because they ■■■■ lives… there are people who steal despite having perfectly good lives.

We were talking about arsonists and then looters.

In relation to the protesters.

■■■■ lives

You don’t know that.

Of course I do.

In that case I’m sure you’ll have no problem providing evidence that you know all of these people have ■■■■ lives.

Sure. They steal and burn.

That’s not evidence. People with good lives might also steal and burn.

But they don’t. They buy and build.

Rioting, looting, and burning. What the heck do you think you were talking about?