It makes me miss the good ole days of politics when you had to sound bite someone in order to manufacture a scandal. Now you just need to let people speak their mind and they shoot themselves in the foot and then just to clarify, put a few more rounds in it just for good measure.
Yeah I don’t think you’re going to get any takers on that bet
There is a YUGE difference between not condoning something and wishing for the deaths of others
Yes if Pelosi said that I would vote for her opponent. Unless of course her opponent has an actual criminal history like Arpaio’s
Lol we are really stretching the meaning of sjw.
The left wear victimhood as a shield from behind which to lob false accusations against anyone in the way of their progressive progress, and deflecting any criticism with a “You’re attacking the victim here” defense.
This OP is a good example of that. The Mayor is Republican and needs to be pushed aside so a leftist can take his place. So the left ploughs through every word and action of the target to find something they can paint as victimisation, in this case anti-homosexual, and cry about it until the conservative steps aside or the public is poisoned against the target and doesn’t vote for them next time.
What on earth does “Trump has allowed you to come out of the closest so to speak with your opinions on things. The internet has helped as well, because you are kinda anonymous” mean.
I’m one of the few using my real name, and why would I need someone else’s help to express my own thoughts. Maybe you are projecting. Maybe you need the security of a mob of like-minded people to feel safe enough to express your real thoughts. But if why project that onto me?
You shouldn’t assume that because no one has yet agreed in a post, no one therefore agrees at all. That’s logically non-sequitur.
So after 4 days was there even a single condemnation from a right leaning poster in this thread that wasn’t accompanied with a justification of what was said? Not one?
“The only way to change it would be to kill the problem out. I know it’s bad to say but without killing them out there’s no way to fix it.”
I’m not reading all that… I stopped when you attempted to claim the left always try to be a victim.
Dont waste my time with obvious ■■■■■■■■■
You’re in a vast minority. Politics is a team sport and voters tend to overlook or give their party of choice a pass over voting otherwise. You must know this.
So, this occurs to me.
Where in there does he advocate that people do rise up and kill them out? The mayor makes an observation that, if those who would in earlier times be regarded as sexual deviants keep on pushing the legislative envelope on social mores, there will be no end to the civic decline until something kills them out so that they are no longer pushing.
There is no call to violence against gays and transvestites in that statement, is there?
And it’s hard to see that the observation is at all false, considering the record so far of sexual outliers moving the legislative goalposts.
The mayor’s sentiment sounds awfully familiar with a story Ken Klippenstein broke…
“Why are we just apprehending them and not lining them up and shooting them?” Brant alleged Gonzalez asked about a group that had been detained. “We have to go back to Hitler days and put them all in a gas chamber.”
The mayor is really just part of the American Taliban…if they had their way gays would be killed off, women would be baby factories and segregation would be back legally.
I was just quoting him. Not at all false? Killing who would accomplish what exactly?
Did you not read my post? Your question’s answer was in there.
I did. The mayor thinks that killing homosexuals, “transvestites,” and socialists (or minorities in general given his facebook comment) would “kill the problem out.” It seemed like you agreed with that and I just wanted to give you a chance to clarify.
Which you did.
Real class act there
The stories from the border are a nightmare. Dead kids, nooses in cells, Nazi sympathizers, and on and on it goes.
I was going to raise my hand as to having done so but then I went back and reread the thread and noticed I never outright condemned his behavior, just took to task the people defending it.
That’s at least something. I sincerely commend you for that