AI getting ready to eat our lunch

zantax · 2023-12-01T02:44:07.703Z

Now consider they are teaching them to lie and be pretty much anti-white in the name of political correctness. That can’t go horribly wrong.

Gaius · 2023-12-01T09:36:51.452Z

zantax:

Now consider they are teaching them to lie and be pretty much anti-white in the name of political correctness. That can’t go horribly wrong.

Obviously ChatGPT has been programmed to lie.
.

image1046×601 78 KB

.
Other AIs? Grok? Google Bard?
Presumably they would

make a joke about both, or
make joke about neither, or
make a joke about one, but not the other and give no explanation
make a joke about one, but not the other and then attempt a truthful explanation.

ChatGPT response?
Tell a whatever lie is most likely to get continued investors and continued monthly subscribers.
It is straight up fraud. If a driveway repairman did that he’d face criminal charges.

Nemesis · 2023-12-01T10:33:51.068Z

Gaius:

attempt[quote=“Gaius, post:83, topic:245892, full:true”]

zantax:

Now consider they are teaching them to lie and be pretty much anti-white in the name of political correctness. That can’t go horribly wrong.

Obviously ChatGPT has been programmed to lie.
.

image1046×601 78 KB

.
Other AIs? Grok? Google Bard?
Presumably they would

make a joke about both, or

make joke about neither, or

make a joke about one, but not the other and give no explanation

make a joke about one, but not the other and then attempt a truthful explanation.

ChatGPT response?
Tell a whatever lie is most likely to get continued investors and continued monthly subscribers.
It is straight up fraud. If a driveway repairman did that he’d face criminal charges.

[/quote]

This really interests me; however when I try to recreate that same response I get this

image1052×968 101 KB

Gaius · 2023-12-01T10:53:16.638Z

That is interesting. It is also consistent with @JayJay 's statement that the newer versions of ChatGPT were getting better.

If you have the time try replicating these and see what you get:

1

image616×562 53.1 KB

.
.

2

image535×561 44 KB

.
.

3

image998×521 96.6 KB

TIA

JayJay · 2023-12-01T11:33:38.094Z

IMG_27741024×1107 167 KB

IMG_27751005×1118 140 KB

Now this is GPT4. So you gotta pay $20/month to see these changes, I guess.

JayJay · 2023-12-01T11:54:58.949Z

Gaius:

That is interesting. It is also consistent with @JayJay 's statement that the newer versions of ChatGPT were getting better.

If you have the time try replicating these and see what you get:

1

image616×562 53.1 KB

.
.

2

image535×561 44 KB

.
.

3

image998×521 96.6 KB

TIA

For some reason this reply was originally attached to Zantax’ opening post.

IMG_27731519×1095 109 KB

JayJay · 2023-12-01T12:03:44.613Z

Gaius:

That is interesting. It is also consistent with @JayJay 's statement that the newer versions of ChatGPT were getting better.

If you have the time try replicating these and see what you get:

1

image616×562 53.1 KB

.
.

2

image535×561 44 KB

.
.

3

image998×521 96.6 KB

TIA

Nope actually when you use the free 3.5 version, you get the same results.

IMG_27771517×1104 162 KB

IMG_27781481×1126 182 KB

IMG_27761507×1028 111 KB

Gaius · 2023-12-01T15:24:59.590Z

Interesting thank you.
If I could trouble you for one more.

Try writing the question the same same way as before.

image1200×90 40.3 KB

zantax · 2023-12-01T17:02:04.850Z

Get ready for the singularity.

WIRED – 29 Nov 23

Google DeepMind's AI Dreamed Up 380,000 New Materials. The Next Challenge Is...

Google DeepMind researchers say they’ve expanded the number of known stable materials tenfold. Some could be useful for everything from batteries to superconductors—if they make it out of the lab.

zantax · 2023-12-01T17:06:44.100Z

It discovered ten times the number of stable materials humans have managed to find all through history. And people are still walking around thinking it can never take their job.

Gaius · 2023-12-01T17:26:25.488Z

zantax:

It discovered ten times the number of stable materials humans have managed to find all through history. And people are still walking around thinking it can never take their job.

Anything that can do a automated “literature review” on a hard science topic like that is likely to be a very powerful tool.

We should keep in mind however that a “literature review” creates a series of hypotheses
(many of which will likely be true) not a series of truths.

Gaius · 2023-12-01T17:29:58.348Z

Of course it is still known to completely fabricate data and completely fabricate phony-but-believable sources for that data.

EX → The Aussie mayor it falsely accused of taking bribes.
EX → The GWU law professor it falsely accused of non-existent sexual harassment charges regarding a fictious trip to Alaska citing non-existent Wash Post articles.

Bad stuff, that.
If I am right and a culture of dishonesty (still) exists wherever Sam Altman is employed the problem will not be fixed soon.

zantax · 2023-12-02T02:52:42.911Z

Gaius:

Of course it is still known to completely fabricate data and completely fabricate phony-but-believable sources for that data.

EX → The Aussie mayor it falsely accused of taking bribes.
EX → The GWU law professor it falsely accused of non-existent sexual harassment charges regarding a fictious trip to Alaska citing non-existent Wash Post articles.

Bad stuff, that.
If I am right and a culture of dishonesty (still) exists wherever Sam Altman is employed the problem will not be fixed soon.

Already being fixed if the Q* leaks are true, just have other AI agents check their work. Get a consensus with as many AI as you need to reach accuracy. Also rumored to be doing math and offering recursive improvements to the model. This thing is moving fast, you can’t assume what you can interact with now is state of the art, it’s not. This will blow on an exponential curve, not linear.

zantax · 2023-12-02T02:54:59.946Z

People act like AI is just LLM’s, no, that’s just one part of it that can be stitched together with many other AI. It’s modular.

zantax · 2023-12-02T02:57:04.045Z

If you can read this

WIRED – 29 Nov 23

Google DeepMind's AI Dreamed Up 380,000 New Materials. The Next Challenge Is...

Google DeepMind researchers say they’ve expanded the number of known stable materials tenfold. Some could be useful for everything from batteries to superconductors—if they make it out of the lab.

And still not understand this is probably a bigger game changer then the invention of fire…

zantax · 2023-12-02T03:00:37.013Z

Chemistry research, this is across all domains of human research, huge multiplier, like pulling a million highly trained research chemists out of your hat.

Chemistry World

The robots revolutionising chemistry

Researchers working with automated systems are pushing the boundaries of what chemists can achieve in the lab, reports James Mitchell Crow

zantax · 2023-12-02T03:04:12.066Z

It’s all about automating the exploration of various research spaces. That used to be a lot of man hours, AI just breezed through a ten fold larger space in materials than we managed in all of human history in what? A year?

It will do the same in almost every information domain. Now add compute getting faster and cheaper all the time before we had this increased capability, might see that skyrocket to ten or a thousand times faster or more. No limit really, foom foom foom

SixFoot · 2023-12-02T11:38:13.681Z

Graphics designers and general artists are almost obsolete already. Just gotta hash out that extra phalanges fetish the models seem to have. lol

image512×512 42.7 KB

zantax · 2023-12-03T05:03:58.178Z

Take drone defense seriously people.

the Guardian – 14 Feb 23

Iran becoming global drone producer on back of Ukraine war, says US

Officials share declassified intelligence as US seeks wider support for sanctions against Tehran

zantax · 2023-12-03T05:07:48.064Z

Americans should have a right to own defensive drones, we might need them.