103

They are not well off now.
How are things different now? They are getting closer and closer to having nuclear weapons and means to deliver them. We cannot just ignore them. We can try to negotiate with them, blow them up, or wait for them to blow us up.

104

North Korea has been working on nukes for 40 years, and they’ve had them for at least a decade.

You’re missing the point. Having nuclear weapons isn’t about using them - they’re a bargaining chip. A chip they’ve likely had since Bush was President.

1 Like
105

china isn’t paying the tariffs.

106

No, it’s a debt based managed economy.

107

Question: why would we have an election in 2020 if the president is doing a good job?

108

The last two years have been fantastic for people who work, even the ones whining.

109

Yep, but they went against their self interests and voted for Trump anyways

110

If things are going pretty well, why do we get all these threads started by donnie’s deplorables complaining about things?

1 Like
111

You were posting back on the old boards when Obama was president. How could you not remember the 100s of posts by now-Trump supporters who slammed Obama, called him an appeaser, a traitor, you name it.

I wish the old board would still be accessible. Would love to see all of the posters who have done a complete 180. Of course they’s either deny or make some excuse.

1 Like
112

Yes it was. Please do your homework.

113

I get the feeling they don’t care about what they said then or what they say now. This is the Hannity forums.

114

I know. There was a poster who briefly posted screen captures of posts from the old board, showing these Trump supporters how big of hypocrites they were. It was hilarious. I assume the mods banned that person.

115

So you’re saying we should dictates whom farmers choose as customers…for the good of the country?

I think there’s a word for that type of state control…hmmm…let me think…

116

Your missing the point about developing ballistic missile capability to deliver them.

117

And you think this didn’t go both ways? Yes, I remember people blasting Obama. No, I don’t remember the specifics of whom was blasting him over what.
And I also remember those defending him no matter what. I don’t see your point.

118

I believe that was Who with a new alias and that she was indeed banned for it

119

firedog
firedog1000×500 484 KB

120

My point being that NK has been trying/has gotten nuclear weapons. Clinton, Bush, and Obama all have tried to keep NK from becoming a major player. No one is ignoring NK. All through sanctions.

But, why is it that when Obama tried to negotiate and get NK to subject themselves to inspections, it was terrible idea, No way we negotiate with terrorist dictators.

Nothing has changed with Trump in office. Same NK, same weapons, same testing, same crazy dictator family. But now its okay for the President to negotiate? Now the threat is super real because Trump and Kim initially traded insults?

121

I can’t comment on that without seeing what comments were made by whom.
Apparently it is hypocrisy of peoples political opinions that bothers you more than that Trump is taking an activist position here.

122

Trump hasn’t taken an “activist” position. He’s taken a subservient position.

He’s grabbing his ankles.