Addressing the elephant in the womb


#1048

The constitutional protections are not limited to citizens.


#1049

I said there were two ways of viewing sex–as sacred or recreational. That in itself is a choice. Or, are you saying there is only one way to view sex? If so, then to me, it sounds like you are the one who wants control of sex, not me.


#1050

In fact, in MOST it is not.

When people try to spin someone’s admission of justifiable self-defense into a blanket statement that it “acknowledge(s) that abortion is justifiable,” it’s deliberate intellectual dishonesty.


#1051

So there should be, as some are hoping for, a serious criminal investigation whenever that “person”, even from the first division, is lost?


#1052

So, illegal immigrants have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in America?


#1053

That certainly begs the question of anchor babies…now we are on to anchor fetus’?


#1054

Horse hockey. If true the state would be compelled to protect those “bodies unable to protect themselves” but strangely enough they don’t


#1056

An opinion you are entitled to, however the document is not subject to revision thankfully.


#1057

Nope…I am not at all for governmental control of sex OR women’s bodies.


#1059

It’s absolutely true, read the document.


#1060

When does life begin? As I’ve pointed out many times, there are stages to every life. The Constitution does mention a right to life. Are you thinking that the Founding Fathers meant that the right to life begins at age 18 or 21 when one becomes an adult?


#1061

It sure looks like that what he’s saying


#1062

Point out even one who has so much as hinted that. (Your personal projections notwithstanding.)


#1063

Please show where in the Constitution it says life begins with the first division. I can’t seem to find it


#1064

Once again, science determines where life begins.

“Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” are not even mentioned in the constitution.


#1065

I am not speaking of government control. I am speaking of women’s choices (plural) and pointing out that those individual choices build on one another. (No government involved in them.)


#1067

Well when you claim abortion is murder, I would imagine that you would want to criminally investigate if a woman lost her baby outside of her doctor’s “command”


#1068

The law disagrees with your interpretation of that determination


#1070

Point out once – even just ONCE ever – where I claimed that.


#1071

No it wouldn’t. Miscarriages are common and unless someone reported to police such as the attending physician following one that they believed it was due to an intentional act no investigation would be warranted or even justifiable.

These are completely spurious and ridiculous distractions, nothing more.