He didnt say it did
But it does refute your statement that its separate from the woman.
Whether it is lawful or not is determined by the justification under law of the taking of that life.
I shoot someone to rob them, no justification under the law.
I shoot someone robbing me at knife point, completely justified under the law.
The first is a murder, the second is a justifiable homicide as determined by law.
It is in the intended habitat for that stage of life. As I said, earlier choices between two people created the life.
Ok then i ask again, why do you keep bringing up the scientific definition of life?
It is separate and apart. The umbilicus attaches to the uterine wall, itâs natural habitat.
Again, try following the conversation, Iâm not going to rehash it for you.
And under the law, as determined by law, abortion is currently legal.
Where have I said otherwise exactly? Can you provide a quote?
I am. You havent explained why a fetus being labelled scientifically human is relevant. Feel free to link to the post that i missed.
Where did I say you said otherwise? I was simply making a point that âas determined by lawâ doesnt really mean anything in this debate. This is a philosophical debate. Not a matter of fact debate.
Itâs been explained in great detail, if you havenât got it yet I canât help you any further.
Ok. I didnt see the explanation so my conclusion is that you havent explained it.
10truths
And the woman gets to choose if she wants to keep it there.
sikofit:That is for everyone to decide for themselves.
Yes, but to what point? Whether one should be able to choose whether to kill/end a life that resulted in what was considered a recreational activity has deeper ramifications.
So you continue to show that you want to not only control womenâs bodies, but you want to control when and why people have sexâŚbased on YOUR beliefs.
Ask any woman about her pregnancy and theyâll say something like âthe babyâs fineâ.
Youâll never hear anyone grieving over the loss of a child say something along the lines of âno big deal the fetus just diedâ.
By any accepted definition of live the human fetus is a âhuman beingâ.
Which, again, goes back to the womanâs choiceâŚdoesnât it?
And the woman gets to choose if she wants to keep it there.
Under U.S. law, yes. But we are not discussing whether or not there is a law. We are discussing whether it is right, morally, to take an innocent life.
Nothing in our constitution justifies the killing of a healthy baby except in self defense.
Barking out the same lame failed talking points doesnât help your case any.
Nothing in the Constitution justifies the government controlling a womanâs body.
There is no accepted definition of life by which a human fetus is not a living human being up to the moment of itâs death.
I appreciate you sharing your opinion.