Gaius
9
I look at it this way:
If I preach to you, converting you to Christianity and ONLY years later I inform you that because you converted the Romans are going to torture you ti death, then I have done wrong to you and your blood us on my hands.
St. Luke wrote 2 books for his employer (Theophilus).
He opend his second book (Acts of the Apostles) by writing
“Luke 1:1
In my former book, Theophilus, I wrote about all that Jesus began to do and to teach . . .”
He never explicitly states what his second book (Acts of the Apostles) is about, but clearly it IS about what the Apostles did, and he chose to (clearly) contrast it as no longer about “all that Jesus began to do and to teach.”
The teachings in it are quite valuable, but its purpose is to describe what the Apostles did, not what Jesus taught.
Could be either way, but considered in that light, Acts 20 26-27 is more likely (51%?) intended as a description of how Paul behaved, and less likely intended for Theophilus to call to mind something written in Ezekial.