Israel does it all the time especially in places like Jenin in West Bank. Commando squads armed with top shelf weaponry and precision munitions from air when needed.
Ummm
https://www.hotcars.com/american-mq1-predator-drone/
When it was weaponized, it was able to carry 2 AGM-114 Hellfire missiles or AIM-92 Stinger air-to-air missiles. The Predator uses laser-guided systems to guide the missiles to the target, enabling it to be devastatingly accurate.
1 Like
Cause you can’t.
If guns aren’t needed to fight, injure or kill (like you say), then you don’t need guns to fight, injure or kill in a hypothetical fight against tyranny.
You don’t understand anything about this. You should learn Spanish and read about Camilo Torres Restrepo.
Well, either you need guns to fight, injure or kill or you do not. Nothing complicated about this.
Like I said, do your research.
What are you babbling on about. China? Are you saying that without the 2A China would invade the US or that our current government is tyrannical?
LMAO if you think the US is a place of tyranny.
How do you account for other countries having gun free zones and not having mass shootings on a regular basis like the US?
Do you really think that the drone pilot is going to kill his is own family and friends because the government ordered him to?
If civil war breaks out not all of the military is going to side with the government.
Depends on the nature of the conflict, does it not ?
Remember that we’ve already had a civil war once.
So we don’t need guns to defend against a tyrannical government, since they wouldn’t attack us?
You live in fantasy world if you believe a soldier is going to kill his own family because the federal government orders him to.
What a stupid post.
I don’t believe anything like that. What are the odds of soldiers family being in insurgency anyhow ?
So we do need guns to defend against our government? The government who would not attack us?
The soldier and his family are more likely going to be conservative than a leftist.
1 Like
Look at you doubling down on stupid. No wonder I try to never post to you.
Great, so the soldier would likely not have to harm their family especially since they are on the same side.
Depends on who is in charge of the government.
It is not the conservatives who have come out of the closet and talked about eliminating leftist.
2 Likes
No matter who’s in charge, soldiers’ families are very likely to be on their side of the conflict.
