So rather than discuss the case at hand, we’re now gonna make up stuff in insult liberal posters.
2 Likes
I’ll say it’s some of both. It’s not an either-or dichotomy.
In my book, pro-life legislators unleashed by the overturn of RvW went overboard. In many cases that over-reach caused backlashes in their state that left the abortion arena more pro-abortion than when they started. And that trajectory continues to unfold.
Were I in a position to write anti-abortion laws, I would allow for the decision of medical doctors to dictate allowable exceptions. Who better to know that a procedure (abortion or otherwise) is needed to save the life of a person? From a pro-life perspective, even if a doctor abuses his authority in the matter, it would still occur in the margins, and the bulk of abortions the initiative sought to regulate would still be regulated.
2 Likes
Yup. D&C is used for lots of other issues beyond abortion. At the point of criticality in the subject case, the abortion was already performed.
1 Like
I’ll agree with this too.
1 Like
Nice post. Thanks for participating.
Too bad yours are not.
And I’ll go out on a limb and say that even if there were restrictions that allowed the doctor to decide exceptions, you would argue against it. (Very short limb, for the record.)
4 Likes
There are several reasons
- The left has scared the hospital with their fear mongering falsities about the law.
- Leftist administrators decided to sacrifice the woman for the narrative
- Doctors could not perform the procedure because the patient or patient’s family would not allow it.
- Some other medical reason prevented them.
4 Likes
More gaslighting
This case has nothing to do with abortion, it had to do with Marsh leaving the live baby in the toilet.
4 Likes
Are you like this in real life? He gave you a compliment and this is how you respond…
Goodness, take a deep breath and relax. It’s not this serious
2 Likes
The baby was not viable.
She had her life overturned for a miscarriage.
You know that this is going to happen more and more… just like more women dying and being harmed for not having access to medical care.
No.
Technically the abortion she attempted with the pill did not complete. Therefore the D&C procedure would still be use to abort the remaining tissue in the uterus.
Agreed. It was an underhanded unnecessary swipe after a being given a compliment.
1 Like
The baby had a heartbeat still when it got to the hospital. Seems to have been plenty viable.
3 Likes
completely false.
The abortion was completed, the child was dead. Some fetal tissue did not expunge and she was infected by it.
try your lies somewhere else.
5 Likes
and the charges had nothing to do with abortion or Roe
2 Likes
A fetus’s lungs are really functional until a few weeks later into the pregnancy.
The baby might have survived if she miscarried in a hospital with direct access to a NICU… and even then the chances would be very grim.
She miscarried. Had her life turned upsidedown for it and the Grand Jury rejected it.
Things like this are going to happen more and more in this current landscape.
Of course it does.
Before Roe was overturned a miscarriage wouldn’t have been criminalized like this.
Thank you Dr Jezcoe!
The baby survived being left in a toilet for gods know how long, being fished out by EMT’s, being transported to the hospital, and being cared for until the baby finally died. Sounds plenty viable.
4 Likes
The fetus was 20 weeks.
She had just miscarried.
There was sadly little hope for the baby at that stage of development.
The State bringing murder charges was not serving justice in any way shape or form.
1 Like
If there is still fetal tissue in the womb the abortion is absolutely not complete.
