You must be new here 
1 Like
He’s not. 
1 Like
Abortion is legal in many states for full-term pregnancies.
The difference between infanticide and late-term abortion is a question of whether you kill the baby while it is at least partially inside the mother, or you kill the baby after it is completely outside of the mother. A botched late-term abortion means the baby is born alive.
Maximizing preventable death is the primary purpose of abortions.
Notice how he skipped this one in particular?
2 Likes
I understand.
You, of all people…
Um, no.
There is no debate that the primary purpose of abortion is to kill unborn life. The question is when the victims have human rights.
That is demonstrated by this classic debate between Senator Santorum and Senator Boxer:
Santorum asks:
“You agree, once a child is born, is separated from the mother, that that child is protected by the Constitution and cannot be killed? Do you agree with that?”
Boxer responds:
“I think when you bring your baby home, when your baby is born … the baby belongs to your family and has all the rights.”
https://www.ncregister.com/blog/barbara-boxer-pro-choice-until-you-bring-baby-home
The Lib mantra … “Kill it before it has rights.”
4 Likes
Yes, and as Senator Boxer demonstrated even birth is not enough to guarantee rights even though the 14th amendment says that all persons born in the US are citizens.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside . . .
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/
The next logical push will be for retroactive abortion . . .
The unborn has those rights. The question is whether our society will recognize and protect them.
4 Likes
If someone kills a pregnant woman they are charged with 2 murders sometimes.
1 Like
Yes, sometimes.
Of course, that’s not what I was referring to. The context of this thread and of the discussion I was responding to is abortion. In fact, the situation you raised shows the cultural schizophrenia we hold when it comes to abortion. The foundational factor of whether or not the human rights of the baby should be recognized rests on nothing more than whether or not the mother wants the child. It’s the same human life, even if the mother changes her mind. And that decision holds the life or death of that baby in the balance.
3 Likes
Abortion always causes death.
1 Like
If it is successful, yes. There have been a few instances where the abortion was botched and the target of the procedure lived.
1 Like
Kill it before it’s a human!
Just kill it…
I’m reminded of a bit a from the book from the Angel Walk series: Satan twisting the head off a infant proclaiming we win…
3 Likes
Even as an Embryo it IS “human”.
Nope … Thats not it. They know it’s human when they kill it.
2 Likes
Actually you didn’t need to put HUMAN in quotes. It IS human.
I took Wu’s post as a facetious comment on the twisted arguments we see so often from libs regarding the life they support killing.
4 Likes
