124

Postmarked by election day.

That’s the due date.

It’s like in old days when everything was on paper.

Voters voted by election day. Sometimes it took the counters longer than a day to announce the results.

Same thing.

125

This is not logical. If someone posses the capability to fabricate ballots they can just get them in on time. Creating a big controversy to implement the fraud later… which calls even more attention to it is not logical at all.

The claim of “just enough” votes has some reason to it, but it sure as heck is more complicated than just forging a hefty margin on time and claiming a mandate.

126

How do you think people would cheat when each ballot is bar coded to a specific registered voter, and signature checked?

127

What happens if you drop your ballot off in the mail plenty early but the post master general, who has financial interests in the competitors to the USPS, and who has systemically been undermining the agency he heads for his own gain, has done so in such a way as to delay your ballot’s delivery?

128

pelosi’s false narrative works for you. yes, its exactly what he did, enact reforms identified and suggested by previous administrations.

129

Since I have an extensive record of posts on this subject where I have stated over and over that there is no system that is fraud-proof, and that for me, proof of systematic fraud would require far more than a tiny smattering of fraud cases that doesn’t rise above baseline noise of billions of votes cast over decades…in threads in which I know you have participated and responded to me…then you might be able to understand.

I won’t make that mistake as to your level of comprehension again, OK?

:sunglasses:

1 Like
130

did that in 1960, wouldn’t work today.

131

But somehow it would “work” today in a shorter time frame…when the whole world is watching?

Trump won Pennsylvania by ~45,000 votes last time.

That’s a HELL of a lot of illegal ballots to forge in a few days’ time.

There is zero logical coherence to your stance.

132

…and I’ll remember that when I read your post, I can’t take it as factual…until I recall all of your historical posts and then put in JJ context? Got it. :sunglasses:

133

Biden lost his chance at PA with his fracking policy.

Nobody believes the pandering pivot he made.

We KNOW Trump made energy independence a reality.

Everything else is just noise.

:ear:t2:

134

This of course is why his lead in Pennsylvania is larger than in any of the battleground states.

I suppose polling is missing many of these “pro-fracking people” in their polls- they are all too shy to come forward?

1 Like
135

what stance is that? go find where i said anything about forging ballots.

136

if theres concern about the usps messing up your vote get to the polls

137

i unno. i dont commit ballot fraud.

i dont know how people steal identities, or crack safes either. but it happens

138

Then maybe you should stop making false declarative statements like this:

“There’s no evidence of fraud”

139

Oh…good to know you’re not joining the chorus of a Trump supporters trying to make out mail in balloting and the rules for their counting as a Lib ploy to steal the election.

140

No evidence of systematic fraud.

Better?

Fraud cases that don’t rise out of the baseline noise are neither systematic nor evidence of a flawed process.

141

Correction: there is no evidence of massive systematic fraud.

Allan

142

Why would you accuse Trump of that?

143

The logic employed is if you find one fraudulent vote that means there could be millions.

Seriously.