I don’t know. It hasn’t been determined. It also hasn’t been determined that he was the leaker. It’s been stated that it was Russian hackers but even that hasn’t been fully determined. There are many unanswered questions surrounding this whole affair and a botch murder does not satisfy them.
Is it sensible not to look at the pieces of a puzzle and attempt to put the pieces together to see what it is? There are many more unused pieces to this puzzle that aren’t being used if it’s simply a botched murder. That doesn’t mean that it isn’t but…it doesn’t make sense.
The Meuller indictment of the Russian companies disputes that Rich had that data. The DCPD concluded it was a botched robbery.
Snopes, Politifact, Factcheck, NYT and WaPo consider it fake news. This story has been an actual case study for “fake news”.
What keeps you from dismissing it as a conspiracy theory. Anything tangible or just the questions in your own mind.
What a ridiculous analogy. The Bush Administration cherry picked intelligence as justification for invading iraq, just as you’re cherry picking from the DCPD. Just as the Bush Admin was wrong in Iraq, you are wrong in the Rich case. You just proved the point against yourself. Well done.
Really? Ridiculous? I don’t always buy what’s being sold if…it doesn’t add up. There are too many unanswered questions in this to call it a day. Therefore…I’ll wait and conclude…the truth has yet to be revealed.
Sean is an unofficial adviser to the POTUS - they have many phone conversations about various topics.
People should keep 1 & 2 in mind when judging the information gleaned on Sean’s show re: POTUS.
Trump is not loyal.
Since his election, Sean has seemed overly eager to please Trump. I don’t know if he is simply flattered teh POTUS calls him for his opinion, or if there is more to this, but there have been so very many things that trump has done that go against Sean Hannity’s spoken values, and yet he doesn’t criticize him.
Is that what you call what you’re doing? Putting together puzzle pieces?
If that is acceptable, then it is totally fine with journalists putting together puzzle pieces with what they know at the moment and publishing quickly. Both have the same level of evidence. Both show the same level of irresponsible behavior imo.
It’s not surprising that you found a way to justify yourself. What’s next, a defense of the Conet Pizza conspiracy? Just putting together puzzle pieces after all.