I know. You can just resent the impeachee being a better person than you to impeach them. So, all your talk of just reasons to impeach Trump are irrelevant. Just go with the actual reason: he’s been more successful at achieving his agenda than everyone else, despite the unprecedented opposition to him doing so.
Just, wow. Now Trump is a higher quality person then those who would impeach him? How many of them have spent a lifetime cheating on their wives, their taxes, and their subcontractors?
2 Likes
LucyLou
419
Hahahahaha! Thanks for the chuckles!
sikofit
421
Don’t forget cheating those wanting a better life for them and their families out of their hard earned money
You’ve got to admit, the bar set by the aspiring impeachers is not very high, when even a novice politician with feet of clay like Trump can outshine them in his first run for political office.
I can see why they envy him so much.
Nope, don’t have to admit that. That he won improves his quality index not at all.
LouC
424
Has the “devastating question” been asked yet?
Or are we still in devastating question foreplay?
sikofit
425
You’re in devastation denial
LouC
426
Oh, you don’t know the half of it!
Yeah you guys took probably the only chance for a generation to elect a true populist candidate and elected a straight up crook who can barely form a sentence.
3 Likes
The insanity of the Trump-haters is so obviously displayed by their grasping at any pejorative phrase to insult him, even when it is clearly, clearly untrue of the man. No one who watches his fencing with the press without blinding hatred would conclude that he can barely form a sentence.
Now that might be true of Pelosi a lot of the time, who would become president if the haters did manage to lynch both Trump and Pence. But they would be fine with that, because they know the unrivalled real power behind the presidency and foreign policy without Trump would be the unelected bureaucracy.
You’re joking, right? 97% of his public speech is not “fencing with the press”. Hell, we can barely get him to talk to the press without a helicopter roaring in the background.
1 Like
Honestly, the irrational hate is palpable.
That’s a talking point, not a response.
I didn’t call your talking point a response.
OK I’ll bite. What was my talking point?
You said,
" You’re joking, right? 97% of his public speech is not “fencing with the press”. Hell, we can barely get him to talk to the press without a helicopter roaring in the background"
That demonstrates your ability to cut and paste, not your acumen. What was my point?
