Then there must have been an associated contempt citation. Right?
When does Barr head to the lockup?
The three branches have been battling each other over turf since 1789.
WuWei
84
A judge(s) will decide. How do you think thatâs going to go?
My question is: Why is there a âspecial waiverâ for deporting criminals in the first place?
Smyrna
85
No. Letâs start with the very first law broken, fix it and move on to the next. Whoâs first? Oh yeahâŚthe illegal alien. Remove them to the correct side of the border and have them enter the country legally. Now whatâs the next problemâŚohâŚthere isnât oneâŚso that takes care of that too. WowâŚisnât this easy and equally fair to all? YepâŚand thatâs how I roll.
1 Like
Alright, deport Trump too if you can.
No one is suggest not removing them.
We are suggest the President doesnt break the law
So you no longer care if the government follows the lawâŚ
zantax
89
It wasnât struck downâŚ
Smyrna
90
Really? How long has this illegal alien not been removed? Actions speak louder than words.
1 Like
So its okay to break the law if agree with the reason.
zantax
92
I am going to go out on a limb and guess this waiver law was written something like this.
From Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused âMeddlingâ in U.S. Election - The New York Times
(iii)Waiver authorized
The Attorney General may, in his discretion for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest, waive application of clause (i) in the case of any alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if the alien has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided only an individual who at the time of the offense was the alienâs spouse, parent, son, or daughter (and no other individual) to enter the United States in violation of law.
Smyrna
93
Iâm simply correcting your misstatement that you choose to ignore butâŚI do not. I want all laws enforcedâŚequallyâŚperiod.
zantax
94
No idea where Barr and this admin got the crazy idea Barr was the only person statutorily that can issue a waiver. Anyone have a link to the exact statute?
WuWei
95
Iâm ok with defiance of a bad SCOTUS decision. My contract doesnât say I agree to be ruled by a nonumvirate of unelected lawyers who routinely ignore it.
WuWei
96
Stare decisis is the law of the land, not the Constitution. Self-licking ice cream cone.
What a â â â â â â up circular argument.
Their power is now absolute.
1 Like
sure it was, your statement was in error. EO 13769 was never fully litigated. The plaintiffâs challenges were rendered moot with the implementation of EO 13780 & EO 9645. As a result the plaintiffâs dropped their lawsuit. Your assertion that EO13769 was âstruck downâ for being unconstitutional is wrong since no verdict was ever rendered in the lawsuit.
3 Likes
I never thought Iâd see the day when a principled conservative would flatly declare that the founding fathers were full of â â â â when they developed a system of government to guard against exactly this kind of behavior.
Who am I kidding? Iâve been watching it happen for over three years.
1 Like
Struck down and revised till it met the standards of our laws.
