Samm
423
You are right, he deliberately called him a Mexican, but the racist connotation (which was based on the misuse of the word by others) was inadvertent.
You are not an authority on the definition of the word.
WuWei
426
Care to answer the question?
WuWei
429
I donât know yet. You seem to need to convolute it with âethnicityâ in order to excuse Trump. Iâm still working through it.
Whatâs the difference between a racist and an ethnicist?
WuWei
430
How was it inadvertent? He didnât mean to say Curiel is Mexican?
Didnât claim to be, I looked it up.
Is race a social construct?
zantax
431
Not a construct that includes transforming nationality into race.
zantax
433

WuWei:
No. Center stage.
Iâd call 80 some trips to the white house up on the stage.
WuWei
434
Actually it does, but ok. What is Mexican nationality about Curiel that made Trump believe he is Mexican?
You canât have it both ways.
Trump claimed Curiel had attacked him and his border policies and would be unable to be objective because âhe is, we believe, Mexican.â Curiel was born in Indiana, so obviously he is not of Mexican nationality.
So what is Mexican about Curiel. @samm said âethnicityâ. What is the difference between race and ethnicity? Did Trump use the difference to distinguish why he believes Curiel is âMexicanâ?
On what basis do âhe is, we believe, Mexicanâ?

WuWei:
Myth. A fairy tale.
I voted for and still like Obama. However, I donât think most liberals realize the damage his guns and bibles quote did. Most liberals see it as not a big deal and even true. Conservatives see bibles and guns as the foundation of this country.
WuWei
436
I would call being on the stage being center stage. They had to check the book to see how many times he went.
But ok.
WuWei
437
I didnât think the US was ready yet, but I was wrong.
I didnât vote for him and I donât like him as a President.
Having said that, he evolved into a not terrible one. Setting a couple of things aside really improves his score from me. But they canât be set aside.
Yes, he insulted a lot of people with that remark. And Trump insulted a lot of people with some of his remarks.
I will not fault one and not the other.
1 Like
WuWei
438
I didnât think the US was ready yet, but I was wrong.
I didnât vote for him and I donât like him as a President.
Having said that, he evolved into a not terrible one. Setting a couple of things aside really improves his score from me. But they canât be set aside.
Yes, he insulted a lot of people with that remark. And Trump insulted a lot of people with some of his remarks.
I will not fault one and not the other.
zantax
443

WuWei:
Actually it does, but ok. What is Mexican nationality about Curiel that made Trump believe he is Mexican?
You canât have it both ways.
Trump claimed Curiel had attacked him and his border policies and would be unable to be objective because âhe is, we believe, Mexican.â Curiel was born in Indiana, so obviously he is not of Mexican nationality.
So what is Mexican about Curiel. @samm said âethnicityâ. What is the difference between race and ethnicity? Did Trump use the difference to distinguish why he believes Curiel is âMexicanâ?
On what basis do âhe is, we believe, Mecicanâ?
I would imagine the fact that his parents came here from Mexico. In any case I wouldnât hold Trump up as an expert on race. Simple fact, nationality is not a race, no matter what Trump or anyone else thinks. Mexico, like every other country has citizens from every race.
WuWei
444

zantax:
I would imagine the fact that his parents came here from Mexico. In any case I wouldnât hold Trump up as an expert on race. Simple fact, nationality is not a race, no matter what Trump or anyone else thinks. Mexico, like every other country has citizens from every race.
Then it wasnât based on nationality, it was based on something else. What? What other characteristics was it based on?
What is the difference between race and what ever else he used (ethmicity) when using it to disparage?
Race and ethnicity share far more than they separate. They are both social constructs, not science. So when you attack someone based on them, you are cutting too fine a line to distinguish.
This is the judge. His name is Gonzalo Paul Curiel. What about him leads us to believe his nationality is Mexican?
It was a racist remark. âEthnicistâ doesnât exist. âCulturistâ doesnât exist, although Iâm working on it. Iâm a culturist myself.
Is there anything Curiel has done that would lead us to believe he is incapable of ruling objectively on the law because of his ethnicity?
How about culture? Now that one I would say yes. He seems to be a prog. Did Trump call him a prog? No, he called him a Mexican. Heâs not a Mexican, heâs an American. Has been since birth. A natural born citizen. A Hoosier.
Did Trump say he is a Mexican national?
If youâre going to use it as a race, itâs racism. If youâre using it to split hairs between race and ethnicity to disparage, itâs racism.
My son is half Colombian. He has been called a âwetbackâ. Racism?
WuWei
445
I agree.
What does that have to do with Curielâs nationality?
zantax
446
Again, no matter what Trump or anyone else may say about someone, nationality is not a race.