65% of voters believe the Clinton spying allegations are worse than Watergate

[YOSUP]

@Bill.in.PA

A new poll shows that 65% believe that the Clinton scandal is worse than Watergate.

x.com

Tucker Carlson reviews the spying and disinformation campaign coming from Hiliary Clinton and her allies in media since 2016.

Here is an outline:

https://youtu.be/Hb-fQTm_fP0

Here is an outline of the Carlson video:
:05 The more outlandish the claim from Trump, the more likely it was the truth.
1:30 Media portrayed Trump’s accusations of Clinton spying as a form of treason.
2:55 CBS claimed that Trump was secretly working with Putin in 2016 based on a Slate article.
3:55 The Jake Sullivan claimed that used “public reporting” from “computer scientists” to claim connections between the Trump campaign and Russia. The claims were used to launch an FBI investigation., Sullivan is now spokesman for the Biden State Department.
6:15 A pro-Clinton activist ran the spying operation used access they had as government contractor to spy on Trump
8:15 Washington Post is falsely claiming that the reports have been debunked
9:00 Clinton accused Trump of supporting espionage
10:00 The Russians never hacked the DNC, evidence shows the DNC hack was most likely an inside job.

My comments:
Clinton spied.
The media lied.
Now they hide.
Has democracy died?

He lied about working for the Clinton campaign and yet you can track his billable hours to the Alfa bank scandal and it even says as much on the ledger! Who in their right mind is going to go to the FBI tell them they work for Clinton and they hacked the DNS and IP of their opponents servers and mined information about Alfa bank that was all made up! Sussman is wanting evidence thrown out that ties his banking account to the tech firm and the alfa bank connection, that will never happen!

[toreyj01]

@bigtwnvin

@JayJay

65% can’t remember what they had for breakfast this morning,

You think they can remember the Nixon Adminsitration.

(Actually 65% likely believe anything they read on social media).

I do. Multi grain toast with peanut butter (crunchy, is there any other kind) and honey, oj, coffee and green grapes.
And Prez Nixon actually sent me a letter when I was 19! It began “Greetings from your President”! I was so humbled.

I got a letter from Nixon too, I was obsessed with Dinosaurs and wanted to preserve the parks where the bones were, he sent me a letter, plus I got a letter from the Interior Secretary and a park guide. I was really jazzed.

[toreyj01]

@DougBH

Pay attention. It is Sussman who is being charged and who was being paid by the Clinton campaign.

He wasn’t.

@DougBH

What do you think his (Joffe) motive was for spying on Trump? He expected to get the benefit from taxpayer dollars once Hillary was in the Whire House. You are being played by the usual Hillary apologists.

He didn’t, the information was about malware at the White House in 2016, the year before Trump took office. And he was contracted to monitor the White House, this was his job.

@DougBH

Joffe was being paid with tax dollars for security work. The question that needs answering was he seriously searching for security leaks or was he trying to build a false narrative against Trump. One was in the scope of his work. The other was not.

This had nothing to do with Trump, Trump wasn’t President then.

[YOSUP]

@toreyj01

This is goofy.

1. The data presented by Sussmann to the CIA involved potential Russian Malware via smartphone detected in the White House BEFORE Trump took office, meaning he presented information about the Obama Whitehouse, not Trump. Durham never said they extracted any data from Trump tower.

2. This information was already reported last October, Durham didn’t reveal a thing here.

3. Durham didn’t even say the WH was “infiltrated”, although folks on Fox are hammering this phrase.

4. Durham never said the Clinton campaign paid the company this guy worked for.

Get a grip, folks, you are being played.

It said Sussman was charging billable hours to the Clinton campaign in regards for working on the alfa bank story, we truly are arguing over semantics at this point and we have no clue what else Durham is bringing to discovery as evidence, no one knew Sussman made up the Alfa Bank story, and he is Hillary’s personal lawyer! To get riled up about Michael Cohen and play down the Sussman indictment is very telling.

[YOSUP]

@toreyj01

@DougBH

Pay attention. It is Sussman who is being charged and who was being paid by the Clinton campaign.

He wasn’t.

@DougBH

What do you think his (Joffe) motive was for spying on Trump? He expected to get the benefit from taxpayer dollars once Hillary was in the Whire House. You are being played by the usual Hillary apologists.

He didn’t, the information was about malware at the White House in 2016, the year before Trump took office. And he was contracted to monitor the White House, this was his job.

@DougBH

Joffe was being paid with tax dollars for security work. The question that needs answering was he seriously searching for security leaks or was he trying to build a false narrative against Trump. One was in the scope of his work. The other was not.

This had nothing to do with Trump, Trump wasn’t President then.

Indictment said the breach of the servers also continued into his presidency in 2016. What do you think WH DNS means?

[toreyj01]

@YOSUP

Indictment said the breach of the servers also continued into his presidency in 2016. What do you think WH DNS means?

Who was President in 2016?

[DougBH]

Seriously, then what did he feed to Sussman, and why do you think Joffe came up with this information? What was his motive? Why was he looking there? Do you buy that he was just an impartial tech guy?

[YOSUP]

@toreyj01

@YOSUP

Indictment said the breach of the servers also continued into his presidency in 2016. What do you think WH DNS means?

Who was President in 2016?

Does it matter who was president? They breached dns servers! If this is all good then let’s stop trying to extradite Julian Assange and Guccifer 2.0!it continued after the election was over.

[YOSUP]

@DougBH

Seriously, then what did he feed to Sussman, and why do you think Joffe came up with this information? What was his motive? Why was he looking there? Do you buy that he was just an impartial tech guy?

For all we know Joffe placed the Alfa bank on trumps servers and acted like he mined it. We have no clue what Durham has as evidence.All we know is Sussman was against Assange but worked with a tech firm to do similar things and got caught due to billable hours.

[toreyj01]

@DougBH

Seriously, then what did he feed to Sussman, and why do you think Joffe came up with this information? What was his motive? Why was he looking there? Do you buy that he was just an impartial tech guy?

It was his job, it was what he was hired to do. The DNC had recently been hacked by Russia and his company was hired to protect the DNC and the White House. This is all nonsense and designed to avert attention away from unfavorable news about Trump of late, his poll numbers are slipping and his legal troubles growing. Time to pull out the Bogeyman HRC and machinate some nonsense.

Folks are getting played.

[toreyj01]

@YOSUP

@DougBH

Seriously, then what did he feed to Sussman, and why do you think Joffe came up with this information? What was his motive? Why was he looking there? Do you buy that he was just an impartial tech guy?

For all we know Joffe placed the Alfa bank on trumps servers and acted like he mined it. We have no clue what Durham has as evidence.All we know is Sussman was against Assange but worked with a tech firm to do similar things and got caught due to billable hours.

All of that is postulation and conspiracy theory, there is nothing on that bone, as of yet. I doubt it will come to anything but certainly it doesn’t merit the attention it is getting. The NYT reported on this months ago, this isn’t news. And it doesn’t mean what Fox is saying it means. They and the rest of the Right Wing Media are machinating a story to manipulate their viewers, nothing more. I think you guys are smarter than that.

[YOSUP]

@toreyj01

@DougBH

Seriously, then what did he feed to Sussman, and why do you think Joffe came up with this information? What was his motive? Why was he looking there? Do you buy that he was just an impartial tech guy?

It was his job, it was what he was hired to do. The DNC had recently been hacked by Russia and his company was hired to protect the DNC and the White House. This is all nonsense and designed to avert attention away from unfavorable news about Trump of late, his poll numbers are slipping and his legal troubles growing. Time to pull out the Bogeyman HRC and machinate some nonsense.

Folks are getting played.

Actually we have no clue if Russia hacked the DNC because Mark Elias never allows the servers to be turned over to the FBI and destroyed them. So you are totally cool with Michael Cohen paying a tech firm to place fabricated data on Bidens server act like it was mined and hand it to the FBI and CIA, then tell Trump about the discovery about Alfa bank that was all fabricated and have Trump tweet about it? You guys would lose your ever loving mind if Trump did this! Claiming you are hacked and justifying it as a reason to hack your opponent is 3rd world BS!

[YOSUP]

@toreyj01

@YOSUP

@DougBH

Seriously, then what did he feed to Sussman, and why do you think Joffe came up with this information? What was his motive? Why was he looking there? Do you buy that he was just an impartial tech guy?

For all we know Joffe placed the Alfa bank on trumps servers and acted like he mined it. We have no clue what Durham has as evidence.All we know is Sussman was against Assange but worked with a tech firm to do similar things and got caught due to billable hours.

All of that is postulation and conspiracy theory, there is nothing on that bone, as of yet. I doubt it will come to anything but certainly it doesn’t merit the attention it is getting. The NYT reported on this months ago, this isn’t news. And it doesn’t mean what Fox is saying it means. They and the rest of the Right Wing Media are machinating a story to manipulate their viewers, nothing more. I think you guys are smarter than that.

There is a literal tweet from Hillary talking about the tech firm and Alfa bank! Durham said the Alfa. And story is fabricated, you have no clue what he knows because nothing leaks unlike Mueller. You had no clue the Alfa Bank story was fabricated!

[toreyj01]

@YOSUP

@toreyj01

@DougBH

Seriously, then what did he feed to Sussman, and why do you think Joffe came up with this information? What was his motive? Why was he looking there? Do you buy that he was just an impartial tech guy?

It was his job, it was what he was hired to do. The DNC had recently been hacked by Russia and his company was hired to protect the DNC and the White House. This is all nonsense and designed to avert attention away from unfavorable news about Trump of late, his poll numbers are slipping and his legal troubles growing. Time to pull out the Bogeyman HRC and machinate some nonsense.

Folks are getting played.

Actually we have no clue if Russia hacked the DNC because Mark Elias never allows the servers to be turned over to the FBI and destroyed them. So you are totally cool with Michael Cohen paying a tech firm to place fabricated data on Bidens server act like it was mined and hand it to the FBI and CIA, then tell Trump about the discovery about Alfa bank that was all fabricated and have Trump tweet about it? You guys would lose your ever loving mind if Trump did this! Claiming you are hacked and justifying it as a reason to hack your opponent is 3rd world BS!

Climb out of that rabbit hole, it’s not healthy.

[DougBH]

Security was his job. It was not his job to cherry pick data and create a false narrative for Hillary so he could benefit during the Hillary Presidency. Since the FBI rejected the implications of the data he tried to sell through Sussman, the indication at this point is that he was creating a false narrative.
Anyone in potential risk of being indicted is going to come up with a story. Someone is being played. It might not be who you think it is.

[YOSUP]

@toreyj01

@YOSUP

@toreyj01

@DougBH

Seriously, then what did he feed to Sussman, and why do you think Joffe came up with this information? What was his motive? Why was he looking there? Do you buy that he was just an impartial tech guy?

It was his job, it was what he was hired to do. The DNC had recently been hacked by Russia and his company was hired to protect the DNC and the White House. This is all nonsense and designed to avert attention away from unfavorable news about Trump of late, his poll numbers are slipping and his legal troubles growing. Time to pull out the Bogeyman HRC and machinate some nonsense.

Folks are getting played.

Actually we have no clue if Russia hacked the DNC because Mark Elias never allows the servers to be turned over to the FBI and destroyed them. So you are totally cool with Michael Cohen paying a tech firm to place fabricated data on Bidens server act like it was mined and hand it to the FBI and CIA, then tell Trump about the discovery about Alfa bank that was all fabricated and have Trump tweet about it? You guys would lose your ever loving mind if Trump did this! Claiming you are hacked and justifying it as a reason to hack your opponent is 3rd world BS!

Climb out of that rabbit hole, it’s not healthy.

It’s a fact the dnc paid crowdstrike to do an internal investigation and that’s what the fbi got instead of the servers, devices were then destroyed instead of handed over to the FBI. Hey if I commit a crime can I elect to pay friends to investigate me the way the DNC did?

[YOSUP]

@DougBH

Security was his job. It was not his job to cherry pick data and create a false narrative for Hillary so he could benefit during the Hillary Presidency. Since the FBI rejected the implications of the data he tried to sell through Sussman, the indication at this point is that he was creating a false narrative.
Anyone in potential risk of being indicted is going to come up with a story. Someone is being played. It might not be who you think it is.

Hillary literally tweeted the Alfa Bank story, she knew this was going on. Her campaign paid Sussman to do this, even says on the payment ledgers. Let the investigation continue and let the court make the decision. Sussman is guilty as sin if you can tie money to this.

[YOSUP]

@DougBH

Security was his job. It was not his job to cherry pick data and create a false narrative for Hillary so he could benefit during the Hillary Presidency. Since the FBI rejected the implications of the data he tried to sell through Sussman, the indication at this point is that he was creating a false narrative.
Anyone in potential risk of being indicted is going to come up with a story. Someone is being played. It might not be who you think it is.

Durham is the guy who brought down Whitey Bulger, and they think he has nothing after taking this long, funny and laughable at best. Dude doesn’t leak! We have no clue what he knows and it drives The media insane.

[toreyj01]

@YOSUP

@DougBH

Security was his job. It was not his job to cherry pick data and create a false narrative for Hillary so he could benefit during the Hillary Presidency. Since the FBI rejected the implications of the data he tried to sell through Sussman, the indication at this point is that he was creating a false narrative.
Anyone in potential risk of being indicted is going to come up with a story. Someone is being played. It might not be who you think it is.

Hillary literally tweeted the Alfa Bank story, she knew this was going on. Her campaign paid Sussman to do this, even says on the payment ledgers. Let the investigation continue and let the court make the decision. Sussman is guilty as sin if you can tie money to this.

From Sussmann’s legal team’s response to Durham…

For example, although the Special Counsel implies that in Mr. Sussmann’s February 9, 2017 meeting, he provided Agency-2 with EOP data from after Mr. Trump took office, the Special Counsel is well aware that the data provided to Agency-2 pertained only to the period of time before Mr. Trump took office, when Barack Obama was President. Further—and contrary to the Special Counsel’s alleged theory that Mr. Sussmann was acting in concert with the Clinton Campaign—the Motion conveniently overlooks the fact that Mr. Sussmann’s meeting with Agency-2 happened well after the 2016 presidential election, at a time when the Clinton Campaign had effectively ceased to exist. Unsurprisingly, the Motion also omits any mention of the fact that Mr. Sussmann never billed the Clinton Campaign for the work associated with the February 9, 2017 meeting, nor could he have (because there was no Clinton Campaign).

[YOSUP]

@toreyj01

@YOSUP

@DougBH

Security was his job. It was not his job to cherry pick data and create a false narrative for Hillary so he could benefit during the Hillary Presidency. Since the FBI rejected the implications of the data he tried to sell through Sussman, the indication at this point is that he was creating a false narrative.
Anyone in potential risk of being indicted is going to come up with a story. Someone is being played. It might not be who you think it is.

Hillary literally tweeted the Alfa Bank story, she knew this was going on. Her campaign paid Sussman to do this, even says on the payment ledgers. Let the investigation continue and let the court make the decision. Sussman is guilty as sin if you can tie money to this.

From Sussmann’s legal team’s response to Durham…

For example, although the Special Counsel implies that in Mr. Sussmann’s February 9, 2017 meeting, he provided Agency-2 with EOP data from after Mr. Trump took office, the Special Counsel is well aware that the data provided to Agency-2 pertained only to the period of time before Mr. Trump took office, when Barack Obama was President. Further—and contrary to the Special Counsel’s alleged theory that Mr. Sussmann was acting in concert with the Clinton Campaign—the Motion conveniently overlooks the fact that Mr. Sussmann’s meeting with Agency-2 happened well after the 2016 presidential election, at a time when the Clinton Campaign had effectively ceased to exist. Unsurprisingly, the Motion also omits any mention of the fact that Mr. Sussmann never billed the Clinton Campaign for the work associated with the February 9, 2017 meeting, nor could he have (because there was no Clinton Campaign).

Sorry but billable hours disagree! He will have his day in court! LOL everyone who is guilty cries they are innocent, still doesn’t change Hillary tweeted the Alfa Bank story and it’s origins begin with Sussman and he lied about his billable hours to not just the CIA but Jim Baker as well. He never told them he billed the Clinton campaign for his work and in fact told them he represented no one. That is lying and that is why he will be indicted fairly fast. Durham is coming at the angle that the Clinton campaign duped the FBI and CIA.