Fact is, it’s the way things are now there is no putting this genie back in the bottle.

The second is enshrined in the constitution and truth is there is nothing that can be done that would not violate that individuals right to own a gun.

Even if we could read that individuals murdering mind that person has a right to an arm.

That was what I was pondering.

Was this a dress and drama male with no added estrogen or hair removal.

Were they a hybrid of chemically induced boobies with a penis and perhaps testicles. Could be quite volatile.

Was this a full surgical conversion that tasted the sweet elixir of transition success and became enraged that every child would miss this utopia?

So many questions beyond magazine capacity.

Everyone is now as confused as the transgender person is was. :rofl:

5 Likes

No. That puts them square in psychopath box.

I’m just trying to be clear on the terms. A transgender “woman” is a male who identifies as a woman, correct?

5 Likes

I believe so.

Although with how crazy early reporting is this could have been a trangendered man (female to male transition).

1 Like

If this was politically motivated, it’s terrorism.

Just like Mcveigh has been a right wing terrorist, here’s left wing trans terrorism.

6 Likes

So they are more of a psychopath than non-trans mass shooters?

I want to see the manifesto.

Chances are there is one.

2 Likes

I think the ones with the chemical boobies and male pelvis have to be a percolating cauldron of dysfunction.

I bet that is what we have…had… here.

1 Like

Do try and follow. You just pulled them out of the box.

I could see either way.

Either a planned act in which case there will be something like you say, or it was a sudden break from sanity.

1 Like

Using cars for the intended purpose, only kills some by accident.
The main intended use of firearms is to kill or injure a living being.

There would still be mass shootings, and deaths caused by firearms, even if those actions I suggest were implemented. However, simple logic says here would be far less.

And everyone who wants a firearm for protection or sport, would still be able to to do those things.

I am not the one to ask.

Nope.

All I can do to play nice on this material. One of our more enlightened can clear this up. They live for that ■■■■■

1 Like

Cars are far more deadly.

SUV mass murder*

3 Likes

No they wouldn’t.

1 Like

Most - if not all - of these people are driven by hate. Hatred is not a mental illness. So I guess the question is, why does America have so much hatred?

2 Likes

Excellent question!!!

STILL takes a human to load, aim, fire.

Well yes. But I think I that case, a human should have known better than allowing a child access to a gun.