I would consider it if i had done something that just disgusts you on a visceral level yeah, ill stop. There is only one person that has accomplished that in my opinion. Like i said before it is the only thing i can request considering i cant block them.
Smyrna
199
Where is it? Have you got a link?
Guvnah
200
You just THINK you demonstrated something.
So ⌠(insert something you made upâŚ)
See? Thereâs another mischaracterization of what I said.
Iâm not arguing they werenât covered enough. Iâm showing you that you didnât show similar coverage.
Youâll make the same mistake again, Iâm sure.
End of discussion.
Zander
201
Sorry, no link for that place. Itâs in our souls.
Thatâs what Iâve been arguing from the beginning of this thread:
Iâve only ever stated that Iâm simply providing a sampling of the coverage.
That will last a few days, and we wonât hear about it again-certainly not 8-10 years from now, like weâre still hearing about the ongoing violence in Nigeria.
I agree-the situations arenât comparable. One is a decades old conflict, and one is an isolated incident in an area of the world that doesnât see much of these types of things.
Iâve been saying all along the situations canât be compared. Glad youâre finally coming around to the fact that the premise of this thread is nonsense.
I wish youâd go tell this to some others in this thread, like the OP and others, trying to suggest that these situations are not alike and are being covered differently.
Youâre tossing the statâs around as though they have some relevance so itâs up to you to show it.
Youâve shown us it gets very little coverage because itâs not really news, itâs expected.
Ongoing civil war vs a single incident, apples and anvils.
No, Iâve been demonstrating it from the beginning of this thread.
I didnât have to make it up. Your lack of knowledge on the Nigeria situation doesnât mean it hasnât been covered fairly, adequately, or objectively.
I NEVER CLAIMED THEY WERE COVERED SIMILARLY. What Iâve stated all along is that the situations CAN NOT be compared, and Iâve gone on and on about WHY that is.
50 deaths in Nigeria, from an ongoing conflict that has lasted DECADES, will not be covered similarly to an incident in NZ that is not common to that part of the world. They SHOULD NOT be covered similarly. One is shocking because itâs rare, the other is not shocking because for the area where it happened, it is not rare.
Thanks for finally admitting youâre here just to argue.
I showed the relevant stats to the topic. Im not doing your homework for you.
No, I showed that the 50 deaths in Nigeria isnât be covered wall to wall BECAUSE it has been ongoing for decades and BECAUSE itâs so common there. And that is a perfectly legitimate reason for the 50 deaths to not get round the clock coverage for a couple of days, but rather as Iâve shown over and over, the situation has received ongoing coverage for years. Thereâs no attempt at a cover up or downplaying the situation. Itâs simply being covered DIFFERENTLY because the situations are not similar enough to compare.
Apples to oranges. Which means they wonât have the same type of coverage.
You havenât shown the to be relevant at all since you havenât shown the percentage of foreign nationals living in the US.
That isnt even relevant to the op topic. I showed all i needed to show to the supposed stats wizard.
I knew he didnât have any stats. What a gyp. lol
Im not reposting them for you.
Guvnah
214
Youâve used up your quota of my tolerance for you tactics. That last one was an abject fabrication. Blatant. False. Untrue.
End of discussion.
You didnât post any to start with. lol
conan
216
So youâre admitting killing Christians is common, so are you surprised that event in NZ took place? Because to tell you the truthâŚI am. Iâm surprised it taken this long outside of few areas in Africa.
Of course it is. Youâd expect most violent crimes of all types to be primarily committed by the majority population.
Who is over represented as offenders, American Citizens or Foreign residents living in the US?
