218

Cherry picking stat’s with no context is a frequent tool of those with no sound arguments to make.

1 Like
219

Right. Be that as it may, you don’t hear too much outrage on Syria whereas anytime an IDF solider touches a hair on a Palestinian’s head, the bleeding heart mob rears their heads.

220

I love Todd Starnes, the latter-day Paul Harvey wannabe.

Also, I wonder who will come out first, him or “I declah” Lindsay.

221

I seen that report, right from the start they say the Parkland shooting was right wing, the detectives said he was just a Stonecold killer who had a history of violence and said he heard demons that talked to him. The SPLC is garbage.

222

You can leave if you wish, and it’s probably a good idea. Your arguments are just contradicting themselves at this point.

“They’re apples and oranges and can’t be compared” and “they haven’t been covered similarly enough” don’t mix, but that has been your contribution to this thread. Contradiction.

1 Like
223

You aren’t reading what I’m saying very carefully. I highly suggest you do some reading on the history of the conflict in Nigeria at hand.

That you’re surprised an attack like this took so long to happen in NZ really backs what I’ve been saying this entire thread-so thanks for reaffirming!

224

Once again you fabricate a falsehood.

225

Yes. that and so much bad ■■■■ happens all around the world, we will naturally focus on the stuff that happens to ourselves or closer allies

226

… snip

Not what he is doing. Youre mischaracterizing him

1 Like
227

I haven’t fabricated anything. You may not like my characterization of your participation so far in this thread, but it is certainly accurate.

“Apples to oranges” while also stating “not covered similarly enough” while also admitting “the situation would have been covered similarly if the religions were reversed” is arguing just to argue.

228

There ya go again, mischaracterizing @party-free

1 Like
229

I’m still waiting for an explanation of why any of this matters. The only thing I can think is its some artifact of right wing Christians needing a jab at the liberal media because they heavily focused on the NZ attacks

1 Like
230

Oh joy. The two libs who I have shown deliberately making things up in this thread are now defending each other’s fabrications.

231

Or what feeds our political agendas? I agree it’s fair to criticize Fox News for over coverage of an attack involving Muslims. It seems however people were sure quick to run a story for 72 hours from a country that hasn’t got this much attention since the “Lord of the Rings” was filmed there.

By reading the coverage and comments here closing in on 4000 you would think the attack happened in Washington D.C. not a tiny country halfway around the world. The number of deaths is a regular weekend of killing in the south side of Chicago, which the response from the media on that seems to be Meh whatever.

232

LOL!

Neither @ImRightYoureWrong nor I are making things up.

You have countered your own arguments in this thread, and still come here tugging away as if you have something to add to the conversation.

You said the two situations can not be compared, but you’re still trying to compare them. You got caught contradicting yourself and are trying desperately to save face. That’s on you.

1 Like
233

You made that up.

Well, maybe not. Maybe through your lib filter you see yourself as honest.

See? You made that up.

I have explained quite plainly why that’s simply not true. I did so in posts (plural) specifically replying to you.

Because you keep making up things, I simply cannot entertain your questions. All I can do now is remind you that I have no basis on which to expect anything but disingenuous participation from you.

234

You claimed the two situations are apples and oranges.

You claimed my handful of examples aren’t “similar coverage” (I never said they were), as if they warranted similar coverage.

You claimed that if the religions had been switched, the situation would have received similar coverage.

Yet you’re still here apron tugging and projecting. It’s so weird.

You can’t even keep track of what you’re arguing, other than ‘argue against PF.’

1 Like
235

Which is a separate claim. One that i didnt really make. I was asked to back up my claim. Thats all im going to say about it because i needed a break.

236

You made up the part I highlighted. (Hint: that’s what highlighting is usually used for. To point out the part of a sentence being addressed.)

And I’ll repeat: Because you keep making up things, I simply cannot entertain your questions. All I can do now is remind you that I have no basis on which to expect anything but disingenuous participation from you.

237

There’s that projection we just talked about!

1 Like