Not enforcing the laws that are already on the books are a factor in motivating libs to desire new ones.
As we know, the dems are currently all fired up over firearm background checks. It seems that there is some evidence that Hunter may have lied on his. So where should this go from here? Investigate it deeper get to the truth? Or drop it, nothing to see here?
Publicly flog himā¦
So addicts at AA and NA meetings are no longer addicts because hunter bidenās daddy is āpresidentā??
Stupid theory and conclusion to ignore your teamās corruption.
Must be ____day.
Change āDemocratsā to āgovernment officials and elitesā and youāre bang on.
Sarcasm wonāt solve the problem. I wonder what you would say if Bison Boy did it.
Donāt make a fool of yourself. Answer the actual question please. Sarcasm is great unless itās being used as an escape to avoid real answers. Are you ready to get back into the game? Where should the Hunter thing go from here?
How long has he been clean? Not that it matters, thereād be pissing and moaning if his drug use was fifty years ago. What does the law say?
altair1013:Donāt make a fool of yourself. Answer the actual question please. Sarcasm is great unless itās being used as an escape to avoid real answers. Are you ready to get back into the game? Where should the Hunter thing go from here?
How long has he been clean? Not that it matters, thereād be pissing and moaning if his drug use was fifty years ago. What does the law say?
I think we agree. We need to look into this a little more. No snap judgements. There are several republican senators who want the record released to them. I think that would be a good start. How about you?
altair1013: Konssurvative1:Publicly flog him
Donāt make a fool of yourself. Answer the actual question please. Sarcasm is great unless itās being used as an escape to avoid real answers. Are you ready to get back into the game? Where should the Hunter thing go from here?
How long has he been clean? Not that it matters, thereād be pissing and moaning if his drug use was fifty years ago. What does the law say?
He was binging and in rehab in 2016. He bought the gun in 2018.
Heās not clean now.
FloridaYankee: altair1013:Donāt make a fool of yourself. Answer the actual question please. Sarcasm is great unless itās being used as an escape to avoid real answers. Are you ready to get back into the game? Where should the Hunter thing go from here?
How long has he been clean? Not that it matters, thereād be pissing and moaning if his drug use was fifty years ago. What does the law say?
I think we agree. We need to look into this a little more. No snap judgements. There are several republican senators who want the record released to them. I think that would be a good start. How about you?
It is exceedingly rare that anyone is punished for answering that question dishonestly, so that must be taken into account, and his known crack use was apparently five years earlier.
Is the fact that he is known to have used five years earlier probable cause to go digging around now?
Or is it more the fact that his father is president?
Iām not against an investigation if it is warranted, but that seems perhaps questionable if all there is to go on is a drug test five years prior.
FloridaYankee: altair1013: Konssurvative1:Publicly flog him
Donāt make a fool of yourself. Answer the actual question please. Sarcasm is great unless itās being used as an escape to avoid real answers. Are you ready to get back into the game? Where should the Hunter thing go from here?
How long has he been clean? Not that it matters, thereād be pissing and moaning if his drug use was fifty years ago. What does the law say?
He was binging and in rehab in 2016. He bought the gun in 2018.
Heās not clean now.
The failed cocaine test was five years prior. Was his rehab for drugs or alcohol. I honestly donāt know.
Adding, how do you know heās not clean now?
The failed cocaine test was five years prior. Was his rehab for drugs or alcohol. I honestly donāt know.
And if the dems have their way, you will never know.
FloridaYankee:The failed cocaine test was five years prior. Was his rehab for drugs or alcohol. I honestly donāt know.
And if the dems have their way, you will never know.
It matters. People are calling for his head and perhaps without knowing the facts.
WuWei: FloridaYankee: altair1013: Konssurvative1:Publicly flog him
Donāt make a fool of yourself. Answer the actual question please. Sarcasm is great unless itās being used as an escape to avoid real answers. Are you ready to get back into the game? Where should the Hunter thing go from here?
How long has he been clean? Not that it matters, thereād be pissing and moaning if his drug use was fifty years ago. What does the law say?
He was binging and in rehab in 2016. He bought the gun in 2018.
Heās not clean now.
The failed cocaine test was five years prior. Was his rehab for drugs or alcohol. I honestly donāt know.
Adding, how do you know heās not clean now?
Asking the homeless where to buy crack. 2016.
FloridaYankee: WuWei: FloridaYankee: altair1013: Konssurvative1:Publicly flog him
Donāt make a fool of yourself. Answer the actual question please. Sarcasm is great unless itās being used as an escape to avoid real answers. Are you ready to get back into the game? Where should the Hunter thing go from here?
How long has he been clean? Not that it matters, thereād be pissing and moaning if his drug use was fifty years ago. What does the law say?
He was binging and in rehab in 2016. He bought the gun in 2018.
Heās not clean now.
The failed cocaine test was five years prior. Was his rehab for drugs or alcohol. I honestly donāt know.
Adding, how do you know heās not clean now?
Asking the homeless where to buy crack. 2016.
Closer, and not a good look. Doesnāt mean he was using in 2018, but raises suspicion levels. Itās 2021 now and it doesnāt mean ā ā ā ā about today.
The article says things like this are rarely prosecuted, so I would guess it wonāt be prosecuted in this case either.
WuWei: FloridaYankee: WuWei: FloridaYankee: altair1013: Konssurvative1:Publicly flog him
Donāt make a fool of yourself. Answer the actual question please. Sarcasm is great unless itās being used as an escape to avoid real answers. Are you ready to get back into the game? Where should the Hunter thing go from here?
How long has he been clean? Not that it matters, thereād be pissing and moaning if his drug use was fifty years ago. What does the law say?
He was binging and in rehab in 2016. He bought the gun in 2018.
Heās not clean now.
The failed cocaine test was five years prior. Was his rehab for drugs or alcohol. I honestly donāt know.
Adding, how do you know heās not clean now?
Asking the homeless where to buy crack. 2016.
Closer, and not a good look. Doesnāt mean he was using in 2018, but raises suspicion levels. Itās 2021 now and it doesnāt mean ā ā ā ā about today.
It means he was addicted in 2018 and knew it. What is the question on the 4473?
The article says things like this are rarely prosecuted, so I would guess it wonāt be prosecuted in this case either.
Then whatās the point of filling it out? And you should see the rules on filling it out.
FloridaYankee: WuWei: FloridaYankee: WuWei: FloridaYankee: altair1013: Konssurvative1:Publicly flog him
Donāt make a fool of yourself. Answer the actual question please. Sarcasm is great unless itās being used as an escape to avoid real answers. Are you ready to get back into the game? Where should the Hunter thing go from here?
How long has he been clean? Not that it matters, thereād be pissing and moaning if his drug use was fifty years ago. What does the law say?
He was binging and in rehab in 2016. He bought the gun in 2018.
Heās not clean now.
The failed cocaine test was five years prior. Was his rehab for drugs or alcohol. I honestly donāt know.
Adding, how do you know heās not clean now?
Asking the homeless where to buy crack. 2016.
Closer, and not a good look. Doesnāt mean he was using in 2018, but raises suspicion levels. Itās 2021 now and it doesnāt mean ā ā ā ā about today.
It means he was addicted in 2018 and knew it. What is the question on the 4473?
Itās a legal question, not a narcotics anonymous opinion. If he stopped using in 2016 for example, no judge in his right mind is going to go after him over that question. Without proof to the contrary, itād be a tough case to prove.