Probably because the mass immigration from the ME into Europe in recent years resembles an invasion.
Why…do they not have a right to defend themselves?
“resembles” - lol

You know it’s intereating to see some forums, even some that posters here might post in, have numerous posters supporting the shooter. Just noticing.
What goes on in other forums has no bearing here.

You have an inherent right to self-defense. Are you saying you don’t?
What does that have to do with guns?
Charlotte was billed by Spencer and crew to be the largest gathering White Nationalists in decades.
How many showed up?
Everything if you understand the subject matter.

Samm:
Zander:
Samm:
Zander:
Samm:
lulubee:
We all know whose side you’re on.
You’re a little out of control. Might want to rein it in a bit.
No she is not.
Strike One
I’d say accusing multiple posters of supporting the shooter and his deed is getting close to being out of control. NOBODY here has done that.
Would you say any posters have explained the shooter’s motivation in a way that could be perceived as rationalizing it?
Such as,
Samm:
His motivation did not come from the US, it came from the behavior he observed of those immigrants who have been flooding into western countries.
If anyone perceived that explanation as a rationalization, they have very poor language comprehension skills.
Okay, but please help me understand. What precisely was “the behavior he observed of those immigrants who have been flooding into western countries”?
You can read his statements as well as I can. Why do you think he referred to them as “invaders”?
I have no idea. I do not consider immigrants to be “invaders,” so that’s outside my wheelhouse. Wy do you think he referred to them as “invaders”?
When they are coming in droves and entering illegally an invasion is exactly what is occurring.
I’m doing it wrong. I can’t find it.

Charlotte was billed by Spencer and crew to be the largest gathering White Nationalists in decades.
How many showed up?
If Richard Spencer “bills” anything as anything, I think it’s safe to assume that anything is absolute horse ■■■■■

You can’t deny he had Trump in his train of thoughts. I don’t blame Trump. I don’t hate Trump. But no one’s hatred of Trump made this guy mention Trump in his manifesto.
How many pages was his manefesto? How many times did he mention Trump?
No, you are merely allowed to vote and that “right” may be taken from you at any time.

We never hear any complaining from liberals about groups like that. Why is that?
Make a thread about em and we can discuss? This also spats of a selection bias so i see no reason to answer.

WildRose:
Charlotte was billed by Spencer and crew to be the largest gathering White Nationalists in decades.
How many showed up?
If Richard Spencer “bills” anything as anything, I think it’s safe to assume that anything is absolute horse ■■■■■
He is full of ■■■■ but that doesnt prevent someone from being dangerous.

Zander:
Samm:
Zander:
Samm:
Zander:
Samm:
lulubee:
We all know whose side you’re on.
You’re a little out of control. Might want to rein it in a bit.
No she is not.
Strike One
I’d say accusing multiple posters of supporting the shooter and his deed is getting close to being out of control. NOBODY here has done that.
Would you say any posters have explained the shooter’s motivation in a way that could be perceived as rationalizing it?
Such as,
Samm:
His motivation did not come from the US, it came from the behavior he observed of those immigrants who have been flooding into western countries.
If anyone perceived that explanation as a rationalization, they have very poor language comprehension skills.
Okay, but please help me understand. What precisely was “the behavior he observed of those immigrants who have been flooding into western countries”?
You can read his statements as well as I can. Why do you think he referred to them as “invaders”?
I have no idea. I do not consider immigrants to be “invaders,” so that’s outside my wheelhouse. Wy do you think he referred to them as “invaders”?
When they are coming in droves and entering illegally an invasion is exactly what is occurring.
I don’t consider it an invasion. You’re free to do so. Enjoy.

Samm:
Phaedrus:
Samm:
The shooter reportedly wrote in a more than 70-page manifesto that he somewhat supported Trump: “As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.”
That’s not exactly hero worship.
It kind of is. The terrorist is essentially saying that while Trump may be an incompetent leader, his heart is in the right place. Based on the terrorist’s actions, it’s entirely reasonable to infer that “renewed white identity” means “whites on top”, and “common purpose” means “eliminate non-whites”. And for whatever reason, he believes that Trump embodies those principles.
That is on him, not Trump.
This is known as a “deflection”. You made the point that the terrorist is not exhibiting “hero worship”. I then pointed out how he is doing exactly that. Rather than acknowledging or refuting my point, you changed the subject to make the point that his hero worship is his responsibility. Of course it is, but we were discussing whether it IS hero worship. And it is.
In your opinion. Mentioning Trump once in a very brief, qualified statement in a 70 page manifesto does not constitute hero worship by any stretch of the definition.
What the hell are you doing here then if not trying to press your jaundiced views onto other nationalities?
We neither want nor need your anti gun rights laws here.
Apparently he was so consumed with himself and athletics he spent little or no time with his family. Perhaps that was a contributing factor. Unattended kids frequently go bad.
Some of these reply boxes are starting to look like 3D objects. lol
They don’t recognize inherent or undeniable rights. Hell they still have the mentality of subjects rather than citizens.