The 26-22 is based on if all the states stay where they are. There might be some Republican states where the vote might flip congressional delegations. Then the Republicans from those states might consider that a vote for Trump will cost them their jobs in the next election.
there already has been. Disqualified ballots being thrown out (instead of being kept for later inspection). People getting duplicate ballots at their residence in their name. People getting dozen’s of ballots at their homes for other people. Moving times of when ballots have to be in by, ballot box in california lit on fire. Mail from postal workers (nothing new, been going on for years) found dumped in the trash. And a whole lot more.
You read the constitution? they have to choose from amonth the three highest in the electoral collage. they can’t just say, hey we want john franklin for president.
I think they are referring to seating house members. I don’t know how it holds up constitutionally but the gambit they are describing is for the house majority to refuse to seat whichever members they need to alter the state delegation makeup.
Sounds like the makings for a nasty nasty fight. Hope we don’t get that tie.
The split POTUS/VP could be fun to watch though if it ever happens.
wrong. its the current congress that is will determine who gets seated. if nanvy pulls something that nuts, mitch van not only not seat democrats, hr can expell the current ones.
following the house lead, i suppose he could then deem whomever impeached and remove them from office
You do realize that the next Congress is the one that does this, right? You’re assuming that the tally remains the same and that the two tied states don’t flip one way or the other.